ReviewThe Indian journal of medical research2013
Biomarkers for the management of pre-eclampsia in pregnant women.
Review in The Indian journal of medical research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- First- and Second-Trimester Uterine Artery Doppler and Hypertensive Disorders in Twin Pregnancies.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Role of serum high-sensitive C-reactive protein to predict severity of pre-eclampsia in a high-population resource-poor country: a prospective observational study.Journal of rural medicine : JRM · 2025Article
- Neutrophil Gelatinase-Associated Lipocalin and Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy: A Cohort Study in Twin Pregnancies.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Increase in Ischemia-Modified Albumin and Pregnancy-Associated Plasma Protein-A in COVID-19 Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- Antigen Analysis of Pre-Eclamptic Plasma Antibodies UsingMolecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2018Article
- An analysis of the risk factors of preeclampsia and prediction based on combined biochemical indexes.The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences · 2018Article
- Are the blood groups of women with preeclampsia a risk factor for the development of hypertension postpartum?Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2016Article
- Towards molecular mechanisms regulating the expression of galectins in cancer cells under microenvironmental stress conditions.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2015Review
- Association between adverse pregnancy outcome and imbalance in angiogenic regulators and oxidative stress biomarkers in gestational hypertension and preeclampsia.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2015Article
- Neutrophil Gelatinase-associated Lipocalin: As a Predictor of Early Diabetic Nephropathy in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.Indian journal of nephrologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pre-eclampsia (PE) is a pregnancy related disorder characterized by hypertension and proteinuria noticeable after 20 wk of gestation. It is a leading cause of maternal and foetal mortality and morbidity worldwide. The aetiology of the disease is unknown, but recent studies have revealed that this disorder appears to originate in placenta and is characterized by widespread maternal endothelial dysfunction. Till date, delivery of placenta is the only cure for the disease. So, there is a need for the identification of highly specific and sensitive biochemical markers that would allow early identification of patients at risk and thus help in providing proper prenatal care. Several promising biomarkers have been proposed, alone or in combination, that may help in predicting women who are likely to develop PE. Maternal serum concentrations of these biomarkers either increase or decrease in PE during gestation. This review focuses on the various biomarkers available and their utility in predicting pre-eclampsia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24056556PMC3767267What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.