ArticleProgress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action2013
Community capacity building: a collaborative approach to designing a training and education model.
Article in Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A systematic review of components of community-based organisation engagement.Health & social care in the community · 2018Pooled it
- Community engagement and implementation science: a hermeneutic review for implementation scientists.Implementation science communications · 2026Review
- Building Capacity for Community-Engaged Peer-Focused Research: Results From the IRIS Recovery Research Fellowship.Health promotion practice · 2026Article
- Implementing capacity-building initiatives addressing health equity through community-academic partnerships: A qualitative study.Translational behavioral medicine · 2025Article
- Measuring Community-Engaged Research Contexts, Processes, and Outcomes: A Mapping Review.The Milbank quarterly · 2020Review
- Implementation and Evaluation of a Dual-Track Research Training Program for Community Members and Community-Based Organizations.Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action · 2020Article
- A Tale of 2 Constituencies: Exploring Patient and Clinician Perspectives in the Age of Big Data.Medical care · 2018Article
- Research Apprenticeship and Its Potential as a Distinct Model of Peer Research Practice.Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action · 2018Article
- Facilitative Components of Collaborative Learning: A Review of Nine Health Research Networks.Healthcare policy = Politiques de sante · 2017Review
- A Culture of Understanding: Reflections and Suggestions from a Genomics Research Community Board.Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action · 2017Article
- Development and Evaluation of a Train-the-Trainer Workshop for Hong Kong Community Social Service Agency Staff.Frontiers in public health · 2017Article
- Community-Engaged Strategies to Promote Relevance of Research Capacity-Building Efforts Targeting Community Organizations.Clinical and translational science · 2015Article
- A Co-Learning Model for Community-Engaged Program Evaluation.Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and actionArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSuccessful community-academic research partnerships require building the capacity of both community-based organizations (CBOs) and academics to conduct collaborative research of mutual interest and benefit. Yet, information about the needs and goals of research-interested CBOs is lacking. Our partnership aimed to conduct a community research needs assessment and to use results to develop future capacity-building programs for CBOs.
methodsBased on our review of the literature, informal interviews with research-interested CBOs and community-engaged research groups locally and nationally, we developed a needs assessment survey. Key domains of this survey included history and experience with research collaboration, interest in specific research topics, and preference for learning format and structure. We trained community health workers (CHWs) to recruit senior leaders from CBOs in New York City (NYC) and encourage them to complete an on-line survey.
resultsFully 54% (33/61) of CBOs completed the needs assessment. Most (69%) reported involvement with research or evaluation in the last 2 years and 33% had some funding for research. Although 75% had collaborated with academic institutions in the past, 58% did not rate this experience well. The four areas respondents prioritized for skills building were program evaluation, developing needs assessments, building surveys, and understanding statistical analyses. They were less interested in learning to build collaborations with academics.
conclusionsA formal needs assessment of research training and educational needs of CBOs revealed that most had experience, albeit negative, with academic collaborations. CBO leaders wanted to build skills to conduct and analyze assessments and program evaluations. Our community-academic partnership is using these findings to develop a research capacity-building course. Other partnerships should consider conducting such assessments to transform the capacity of CBOs to be active research partners and leaders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.