Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24056232›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroscience methods2014

Comparing thoracic and intra-nasal pressure transients to monitor active odor sampling during odor-guided decision making in the mouse.

Johannes Reisert, Glen J Golden, Koichi Matsumura, Matt Smear, Dmitry Rinberg, Alan Gelperin

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroscience methods, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 52% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Mice navigate scent trails using predictive policies.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Intranasal Pressure Recording for Monitoring Mouse Respiration.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Johannes ReisertMonell Chemical Senses Center, 3500 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. Electronic address: jreisert@monell.org.
Glen J Golden
Koichi Matsumura
Matt Smear
Dmitry Rinberg
Alan Gelperin
Monell Chemical Senses Center · USHelix (United States) · USJanelia Research Campus · USPrinceton University · US

Funding

Molecular BiologyP30DC011735 · NIDCD · MONELL CHEMICAL SENSES CENTER · PI REED, DANIELLE RENEE · 2011 to 2015
$2.5M
Dynamic Aspects of Olfactory Signal TransductionR01DC009613 · NIDCD · MONELL CHEMICAL SENSES CENTER · PI REISERT, JOHANNES · 2010 to 2014
$1.5M
NIDCD NIH HHS DC009613NIDCD NIH HHS P30 DC011735NIDCD NIH HHS P30DC011735NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC009613
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecording of physiological parameters in behaving mice has seen an immense increase over recent years driven by, for example, increased miniaturization of recording devices. One parameter particularly important for odorant-driven behaviors is the breathing frequency, since the latter dictates the rate of odorant delivery to the nasal cavity and the olfactory receptor neurons located therein. NEW

methodTypically, breathing patterns are monitored by either measuring the breathing-induced temperature or pressure changes in the nasal cavity. Both require the implantation of a nasal cannula and tethering of the mouse to either a cable or tubing. To avoid these limitations we used an implanted pressure sensor which reads the thoracic pressure and transmits the data telemetrically, thus making it suitable for experiments which require a freely moving animal.

resultsMice performed a Go/NoGo odorant-driven behavioral task with the implanted pressure sensor, which proved to work reliably to allow recording of breathing signals over several weeks from a given animal. COMPARISON TO EXISTING METHOD(S): We simultaneously recorded the thoracic and nasal pressure changes and found that measuring the thoracic pressure change yielded similar results compared to measurements of nasal pressure changes.

conclusionTelemetrically recorded breathing signals are a feasible method to monitor odorant-guided behavioral changes in breathing rates. Its advantages are most significant when recording from a freely moving animal over several weeks. The advantages and disadvantages of different methods to record breathing patterns are discussed.

Indexed as

RespirationTransducers, PressureAnimalsDecision MakingMiceOdorantsOlfactory BulbOlfactory PerceptionSmellTelemetryThoracic CavityBreathing frequencyNasal pressureOdor decisionsWireless telemetry

Identifiers

PMID24056232
PMCPMC3858470
OpenAlexW2016539710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.