ArticleJournal of theoretical biology2014
Tissue architecture, feedback regulation, and resilience to viral infection.
Article in Journal of theoretical biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Tissue homeostasis is one of the central requirements for the existence of multicellular organisms, and is maintained by complex feedback regulatory processes. Homeostasis can be disturbed by diseases such as viruses and tumors. Here, we use mathematical models to investigate how tissue architecture influences the ability to maintain tissue homeostasis during viral infections. In particular, two different tissue designs are considered. In the first scenario, stem cells secrete negative feedback factors that influence the balance between stem cell self-renewal and differentiation. In the second scenario, those feedback factors are not produced by stem cells but by differentiated cells. The model shows a tradeoff. If feedback factors are produced by stem cells, then a viral infection will lead to a significant reduction in the number of differentiated cells leading to tissue pathology, but the number of stem cells is not affected at equilibrium. In contrast, if the feedback factors are produced by differentiated cells, a viral infection never reduces the number of tissue cells at equilibrium because the feedback mechanism compensates for virus-induced cells death. The number of stem cells, however, becomes elevated, which could increase the chance of these stem cells to accumulate mutations that can drive cancer. Interestingly, if the virus interferes with feedback factor production by cells, uncontrolled growth can occur in the presence of the virus even in the absence of genetic lesions in cells. Hence, the optimal design would be to produce feedback factors by both stem and differentiated cells in quantities that strike a balance between protecting against tissue destruction and stem cell elevation during infection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.