Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24053151›Full record

ArticleBJU international2014

Epidermal growth factor receptor-targeted therapy in locally advanced or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the penis.

Bradley C Carthon, Chaan S Ng, Curtis A Pettaway, Lance C Pagliaro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJU international, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 118 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Assessment of EGFR and HER2 expression in penile cancer as potential therapeutic targets.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Metastatic Penile Squamous Cell Carcinoma Responsive to Enfortumab Vedotin.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Penile cancer: Updates in systemic therapy.Asian journal of urology · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bradley C CarthonDepartment of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Chaan S Ng
Curtis A Pettaway
Lance C Pagliaro
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
TRAINING FOR ACADEMIC ONCOLOGY/HEMATOLOGYT32CA009666 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Michael Davies, Courtney DiNardo · 1994 to 2026
$9.8M
NCI NIH HHS 5 P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009666
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the safety and efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-targeted therapy in patients with advanced penile or scrotal cancer. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed the charts of patients with penile or scrotal squamous cell carcinoma who had visited our tertiary cancer centre between 2002 and 2009, including their subsequent treatment and follow-up. We collected details of EGFR-targeted therapy and clinical outcomes. Treatment-associated time-to-disease-progression (TTP), overall survival (OS), responses to therapy and toxicity were evaluated.

resultsA total of 24 patients had received EGFR-targeted therapies, including cetuximab, erlotinib and gefitinib. The most common treatment given (to 67% of patients) was cetuximab combined with one or more cytotoxic drugs. The most common adverse effect was skin rash (71%). The median (range) TTP and OS were 11.3 (1-40) and 29.6 (2-205) weeks, respectively. The OS time for patients with visceral or bone metastases was significantly shorter than it was for those without (24.7 vs 49.9 weeks, P = 0.013). Among 17 patients treated with cetuximab alone or in combination with cisplatin, there were four partial responses (23.5%) including two patients with apparently chemotherapy-resistant tumours.

conclusionsOur results suggest that cetuximab has antitumour activity in metastatic penile cancer, and may enhance the effect of cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Prospective studies of EGFR-targeted therapies in men with these tumours are warranted.

Indexed as

ScrotumAdultAgedAntineoplastic AgentsCarcinoma, Squamous CellErbB ReceptorsGenital Neoplasms, MaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPenile NeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesAntineoplastic AgentsErbB Receptorsanti-epidermal growth factor monoclonal antibodypenile neoplasmssquamous cell carcinomasurvival

Identifiers

PMID24053151
PMCPMC4321685
OpenAlexW1526003541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.