Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24052501›Full record

ArticleNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2014

Effectiveness of nicotinic agonists as desensitizers at presynaptic α4β2- and α4α5β2-nicotinic acetylcholine receptors.

Charles R Wageman, Michael J Marks, Sharon R Grady

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Nicotine Addiction: Neurobiology and Mechanism.Journal of pharmacopuncture · 2020
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Charles R WagemanInstitute for Behavioral Genetics, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO.
Michael J Marks
Sharon R Grady
University of Colorado Boulder · US

Funding

Project 3 University of Colorado, BoulderU19DA019375 · NIDA · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI MARKS, MICHAEL J · 2005 to 2014
$8.3M
GENETICS OF NICOTINE TOLERANCE: ROLE OF RECEPTORSR01DA003194 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO AT BOULDER · PI MARKS, MICHAEL J · 1985 to 2013
$5.5M
Studies with Nicotinic Null Mutant MiceP30DA015663 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO AT BOULDER · PI MARKS, MICHAEL J · 2003 to 2013
$4.5M
NIDA NIH HHS P30DA015663NIDA NIH HHS R01DA003194NIDA NIH HHS U19DA019375
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionNicotine interacts with nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) and modifies neuronal functions. The net result of nicotine exposure is difficult to assess because multiple nAChR subtypes exist and are expressed on multiple classes of neurons. Nicotine, unlike the natural agonist acetylcholine, remains in tissues for hours, and during this extended exposure nAChRs desensitize. Therefore, agonists can block the natural functions of nAChRs. Higher nicotine concentrations are required to desensitize α4β2-nAChRs containing the α5 subunit. The aim of these experiments was to determine if this property holds true for compounds other than nicotine.

methods[(3)H]-dopamine release from crude mouse striatal synaptosomal preparations was used to measure activation and desensitization of the [(α4β2)2β2] and [(α4β2)2α5] nAChR subtypes. Affinity was measured by competition with [(125)I]-epibatidine.

resultsNine compounds of varying affinity and efficacy were tested. All compounds partially desensitized both subtypes; concentration necessary for desensitization correlated with binding site affinity but not efficacy. All compounds showed a similar, significant shift in concentration necessary for a 50% effect when the α5 subunit was included (averaging 8-fold higher). The extent of desensitization produced by a 10-min exposure did not correlate with affinity or efficacy of compound.

conclusionFull or partial nicotinic agonists used as medications may effectively desensitize α4β2-nAChRs. However, significantly higher concentrations of all compounds tested were required to elicit desensitization of α4α5β2-nAChRs than α4β2-nAChRs. If desensitization is the important property for a smoking cessation drug, basic screening at both subtypes may provide a mechanistic foundation for effectiveness.

Indexed as

AnimalsBridged Bicyclo Compounds, HeterocyclicDopamineDopaminergic NeuronsDose-Response Relationship, DrugMiceMice, Mutant StrainsNicotineNicotinic AgonistsPyridinesReceptors, NicotinicSmoking CessationBridged Bicyclo Compounds, HeterocyclicDopamineepibatidineNicotineNicotinic Agonistsnicotinic receptor alpha4beta2PyridinesReceptors, Nicotinic

Identifiers

PMID24052501
PMCPMC3920335
OpenAlexW2147664671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.