Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24051897›Full record

ArticleMedical care research and review : MCRR2014

Adoption of evidence-based clinical innovations: the case of buprenorphine use by opioid treatment programs.

Christina M Andrews, Thomas A D'Aunno, Harold A Pollack, Peter D Friedmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical care research and review : MCRR, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Misalignment of Stakeholder Incentives in the Opioid Crisis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Availability of Medications for the Treatment of Alcohol and Opioid Use Disorder in the USA.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2020
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. A mixed methods study of HIV-related services in buprenorphine treatment.Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy · 2017
    Article
  15. Estimating State Transitions for Opioid Use Disorders.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2017
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Christina M Andrews1University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Thomas A D'Aunno
Harold A Pollack
Peter D Friedmann

Funding

Impact of health reform on outpatient substance abuse treatment programsR01DA034634 · NIDA · RHODE ISLAND HOSPITAL · PI FRIEDMANN, PETER D · 2013 to 2017
$4.0M
Testing a Comprehensive Model of the Diffusion of Evidence-Based PracticesR01DA030459 · NIDA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI D'AUNNO, THOMAS · 2011 to 2012
$926k
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA030459NIDA NIH HHS R01DA030459-02NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA034634
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article examines changes from 2005 to 2011 in the use of an evidence-based clinical innovation, buprenorphine use, among a nationally representative sample of opioid treatment programs and identifies characteristics associated with its adoption. We apply a model of the adoption of clinical innovations that focuses on the work needs and characteristics of staff; organizations' technical and social support for the innovation; local market dynamics and competition; and state policies governing the innovation. Results indicate that buprenorphine use increased 24% for detoxification and 47% for maintenance therapy between 2005 and 2011. Buprenorphine use was positively related to reliance on private insurance and availability of state subsidies to cover its cost and inversely related to the percentage of clients who injected opiates, county size, and local availability of methadone. The results indicate that financial incentives and market factors play important roles in opioid treatment programs' decisions to adopt evidence-based clinical innovations such as buprenorphine use.

Indexed as

BuprenorphineDiffusion of InnovationEvidence-Based MedicineHumansNarcotic AntagonistsOpiate Substitution TreatmentOpioid-Related DisordersSubstance Abuse Treatment CentersBuprenorphineNarcotic Antagonistsadoptionbuprenorphineevidence-based practiceinnovationopioid treatment

Identifiers

PMID24051897
PMCPMC4399853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.