Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24051410›Full record

ArticleEye (London, England)2013

United Kingdom National Ophthalmology Database Study: Diabetic Retinopathy; Report 1: prevalence of centre-involving diabetic macular oedema and other grades of maculopathy and retinopathy in hospital eye services.

T D L Keenan, R L Johnston, P H J Donachie, J M Sparrow, I M Stratton, P Scanlon

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Eye (London, England), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Treatment of Diabetes in Older Adults: An Endocrine Society* Clinical Practice Guideline.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2019
    Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Synthesis, Antioxidant, and Antidiabetic Activities of Ketone Derivatives of Succinimide.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

T D L KeenanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Manchester Royal Eye Hospital and University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
R L Johnston1] The Royal College of Ophthalmologists' National Ophthalmology Database project, London, UK [2] Department of Ophthalmology, Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cheltenham, UK.
P H J Donachie1] The Royal College of Ophthalmologists' National Ophthalmology Database project, London, UK [2] Department of Ophthalmology, Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cheltenham, UK.
J M Sparrow1] The Royal College of Ophthalmologists' National Ophthalmology Database project, London, UK [2] Department of Ophthalmology, Bristol Eye Hospital and University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
I M Stratton1] The Royal College of Ophthalmologists' National Ophthalmology Database project, London, UK [2] Department of Ophthalmology, Gloucestershire Diabetic Retinopathy Research Group, Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cheltenham, UK.
P Scanlon1] Department of Ophthalmology, Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cheltenham, UK [2] Department of Ophthalmology, Gloucestershire Diabetic Retinopathy Research Group, Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cheltenham, UK.
Royal College of Ophthalmologists · GBGloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo report estimates of the prevalence of diabetic retinopathy (DR) and maculopathy grades for a large cohort of patients managed by the UK hospital eye service (HES).

methodsAnonymised data were extracted from 30 UK NHS hospital trusts using a single ophthalmic electronic medical record (EMR) for the period from April 2000 to November 2010 to create the National Ophthalmology Database (NOD). From 2007, the EMR facilitated capture of a nationally agreed-upon standardised data set (DR Structured Assessment) relating to the presence or absence of clinical signs of DR and maculopathy. An algorithm in the software automatically calculated the Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study grades of retinopathy and maculopathy.

resultsBetween 2007 and 2010, 307,538 patients had data on the NOD, with 76,127 (24.8%) patients having been recorded as having diabetes. The proportion of patients with diabetes who had a structured assessment increased from 50.7% (2007) to 86.8% (2010). In each NHS year, 12.6-20.6% of eyes with structured assessments had no DR; 59.6-67.3% had non-proliferative DR; and 18.3-20.9% had active or regressed proliferative DR. Clinically significant macular oedema was present in 15.8-18.1% of eyes, and in 8.7-10.0% of eyes, this involved the central macula.

conclusionThis study provides contemporary estimates of the prevalence of retinopathy and maculopathy grades in a large cohort of patients with diabetes managed by the UK HES. Centre-involving diabetic macular oedema, potentially amenable to anti-VEGF therapy, is present in the eyes of almost 10% of these patients. This information is useful for clinicians, health-care economists, and commissioners involved in planning and delivering diabetic eye services.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildChild, PreschoolDatabases, FactualDiabetic RetinopathyElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHospital DepartmentsHumansInfantMacular EdemaMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID24051410
PMCPMC3869516
OpenAlexW2158281365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.