Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24051388›Full record

ArticleAnesthesiology2013

Intrathecal substance P-saporin in the dog: distribution, safety, and spinal neurokinin-1 receptor ablation.

Ashley J Wiese, Michael Rathbun, Mark T Butt, Shelle A Malkmus, Philip J Richter, Kent G Osborn, Qinghao Xu, Samantha L Veesart, Joanne J Steinauer, Denise Higgins and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Anesthesiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. A perspective: neuraxial therapeutics in pain management: now and future.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. The beneficial role of companion animals in translational pain research.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Frontiers in Pain Research: A Scope of Its Focus and Content.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Ashley J Wiese* Research Fellow, † Staff Research Associate, # Postdoctoral Fellow, §§ Professor of Anesthesiology and Pharmacology, Department of Anesthesiology, University of California, San Diego, California. ‡ President, Tox Path Specialists, LLC, Frederick, Maryland. § Director, Campus Veterinary Medicine, ‖ Associate Director, Diagnostic Laboratory, Office of Animal Research, University of California. ** Vice President, †† President/CSO, ‡‡ Research Scientist, Advanced Targeting Systems, San Diego, California.
Michael Rathbun
Mark T Butt
Shelle A Malkmus
Philip J Richter
Kent G Osborn
Qinghao Xu
Samantha L Veesart
Joanne J Steinauer
Denise Higgins
Douglas A Lappi
Brian Russell
Tony L Yaksh
Marymount University · USNational Postdoctoral Association · USUniversity of California, Berkeley · USUniversity of California, San Diego · USUniversity of Veterinary Medicine · HU

Funding

TOXICOLOGY/SAFETY STUDIES OF A CHRONIC PAIN THERAPEUTICR44MH056368 · NIMH · ADVANCED TARGETING SYSTEMS, INC. · PI LAPPI, DOUGLAS A · 1998 to 2005
$3.1M
Development of a Novel Cancer Pain TherapeuticRC3CA150822 · NCI · ADVANCED TARGETING SYSTEMS, INC. · PI LAPPI, DOUGLAS A · 2010 to 2010
$3.0M
NCI NIH HHS 1RC3CA150822NIMH NIH HHS R44 MH056368
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeurokinin-1 receptors (NK1-rs) located on superficial dorsal horn neurons are essential for integration of nociceptive input. Intrathecal injection of substance P-saporin (SP-SAP) leads to local loss of spinal NK1-r (+) neurons suggesting its potential as a therapeutic agent for chronic pain. The authors determined, in a canine model, effects of lumbar intrathecal SP-SAP.

methodsDistribution of SP-SAP and Saporin was determined in plasma, lumbar cerebrospinal fluid, and tissue. Safety of intrathecal SP-SAP was determined in four groups (six dogs each) administered 0 (0.9% saline), 1.5, 15, or 150 µg SP-SAP through lumbar intrathecal catheters. Behavioral, physiologic, and biochemical variables were assessed. Spinal tissues were collected at 7 and approximately 90 days, or earlier if significant morbidity developed, and analyzed for NK1-r (+) neuron loss and histopathology.

resultsSP-SAP and Saporin were detectable in lumbar cerebrospinal fluid for up to 4 and 24 h, respectively. Animals receiving intrathecal saline, 1.5, or 15 µg of SP-SAP showed no persistent neurologic deficits. Three animals receiving 150 µg of SP-SAP developed pelvic limb paraparesis and were euthanized prematurely. Immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization cell counts confirmed a significant reduction in NK1-r (+) in superficial dorsal horn neurons from lumbar spinal cord after intrathecal administration of 15 and 150 µg of SP-SAP. A significant loss of NK1-r neurons in the lumbar ventral horn occurred only with 150-µg SP-SAP.

conclusionIntrathecal 15-µg SP-SAP reduced dorsal, but not ventral, NK1-r (+) neurons at the spinal level of delivery with minimal side effects, whereas 150-µg SP-SAP resulted in motor neuron toxicity.

Indexed as

Neurokinin-1 Receptor AntagonistsAnimalsBehavior, AnimalBlood PressureBody TemperatureBody WeightDogsEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFluorescent Antibody TechniqueInjections, SpinalIn Situ HybridizationNeurologic ExaminationNeurotoxicity SyndromesOphthalmoscopyPhenotypeReceptors, Neurokinin-1Neurokinin-1 Receptor AntagonistsReceptors, Neurokinin-1Ribosome Inactivating Proteins, Type 1SaporinsSubstance Psubstance P-saporin

Identifiers

PMID24051388
OpenAlexW1969289261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.