Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24051346›Full record

ArticleThe journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences2014

A clinical frailty index in aging mice: comparisons with frailty index data in humans.

Jocelyne C Whitehead, Barbara A Hildebrand, Michael Sun, Michael R Rockwood, Robert A Rose, Kenneth Rockwood, Susan E Howlett

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 331 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
331citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

331 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. How human and animal frailty index studies can inform each other: a brief narrative review.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2026
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Frailty, polypharmacy, deprescribing, and 23-hour activity: insights from a mouse model.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  20. Article

271 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jocelyne C WhiteheadDepartment of Pharmacology.
Barbara A HildebrandCarleton Animal Care Facility.
Michael SunDepartment of Pharmacology.
Michael R RockwoodDepartment of Medicine (Geriatric Medicine) and.
Robert A RoseDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Kenneth RockwoodDepartment of Medicine (Geriatric Medicine) and.
Susan E HowlettDepartment of Pharmacology, Department of Medicine (Geriatric Medicine) and Susan.Howlett@dal.ca.

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research MOP 126018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We previously quantified frailty in aged mice with frailty index (FI) that used specialized equipment to measure health parameters. Here we developed a simplified, noninvasive method to quantify frailty through clinical assessment of C57BL/6J mice (5-28 months) and compared the relationship between FI scores and age in mice and humans. FIs calculated with the original performance-based eight-item FI increased from 0.06 ± 0.01 at 5 months to 0.36 ± 0.06 at 19 months and 0.38 ± 0.04 at 28 months (n = 14). By contrast, the increase was graded with a 31-item clinical FI (0.02 ± 0.005 at 5 months; 0.12 ± 0.008 at 19 months; 0.33 ± 0.02 at 28 months; n = 14). FI scores calculated from 70 self-report items from the first wave of the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe were plotted as function of age (n = 30,025 people). The exponential relationship between FI scores and age (normalized to 90% mortality) was similar in mice and humans for the clinical FI but not the eight-item FI. This noninvasive FI based on clinical measures can be used in longitudinal studies to quantify frailty in mice. Unlike the performance-based eight-item mouse FI, the clinical FI exhibits key features of the FI established for use in humans.

Indexed as

AgingHealth StatusAgedAged, 80 and overAnimalsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesFrail ElderlyGeriatric AssessmentHumansMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLTime FactorsDeficit accumulationDeficit indexFrailty indexSenescence.

Identifiers

PMID24051346
PMCPMC4022099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.