Trial reportPublic health nutrition2014
Evaluating free school fruit: results from a natural experiment in Norway with representative data.
Trial report in Public health nutrition, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The Impact of School-Based Nutrition Interventions on Parents and Other Family Members: A Systematic Literature Review.Nutrients · 2022Pooled it
- Systematic review on fiscal policy interventions in nutrition.Frontiers in nutrition · 2022Pooled it
- Outcome evaluation of fruits and vegetables distribution interventions in schools: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Public health nutrition · 2021Pooled it
- Using natural experiments to improve public health evidence: a review of context and utility for obesity prevention.Health research policy and systems · 2020Pooled it
- The effect of free school fruit on academic performance: a nationwide quasi-experiment.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Adolescent vegetable consumption: the role of socioemotional family characteristics.Public health nutrition · 2021Article
- Process evaluation of fruit and vegetables distribution interventions in school-based settings: A systematic review.Preventive medicine reports · 2021Review
- Time trends (1995-2008) in dietary habits among adolescents in relation to the Norwegian school fruit scheme: the HUNT study.Nutrition journal · 2019Article
- Modelling the Effect of Compliance with Nordic Nutrition Recommendations on Cardiovascular Disease and Cancer Mortality in the Nordic Countries.Nutrients · 2019Article
- Increasing fruit and vegetable intake: where are we at and how do we reach recommendations?Public health nutrition · 2015Article
- School - a multitude of opportunities for promoting healthier eating.Public health nutrition · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess impacts of the nationwide Norwegian School Fruit Scheme (NSFS) using nationally representative data.
designThe NSFS is organized such that primary-school children (grades 1-7) are randomly assigned to one of three school fruit arrangements: (i) the child receives one free fruit or vegetable per day; (ii) the child is given the option to subscribe to one fruit or vegetable per day at a subsidized price; and (iii) the child attends a school that has no school fruit arrangement.
settingData from an Internet survey are used to compare child and parental fruit and vegetable intakes across the three NSFS groups focusing mainly on groups (i) and (iii). The analysis was conducted using multivariate regression techniques. SUBJECTS: Parents of primary-school children (n 1423) who report on behalf of themselves and their children.
resultsChildren who receive free school fruit eat on average 0·36 more fruit portions daily - or 25·0 % more fruits - than children who attend schools with no fruit arrangement (P < 0·001). Moreover, parents of children who receive free school fruit eat on average 0·19 more fruit portions daily - or 12·5 % more fruits - than parents of children who attend schools with no fruit arrangement (P = 0·040). No significant associations were found between the NSFS and the vegetable intakes of children and their parents.
conclusionsThe study shows, using nationally representative data, that free school fruit is associated with increased child fruit intake and that it may also affect parental fruit intake.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.