SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2014
Coenzyme Q10 for heart failure.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
41 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 93 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of coenzyme Q10 in heart failure: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2024Pooled it
- Problems with the outcome measures in randomized controlled trials of traditional Chinese medicine in treating chronic heart failure caused by coronary heart disease: a systematic review.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2021Pooled it
- Coenzyme Q10 for heart failure.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Coenzyme Q10 in the treatment of heart failure: A systematic review of systematic reviews.Indian heart journal · 2018Pooled it
- Recent Developments in the Role of Coenzyme Q10 for Coronary Heart Disease: a Systematic Review.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2018Pooled it
- Efficacy of coenzyme Q10 in patients with cardiac failure: a meta-analysis of clinical trials.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2017Pooled it
- Effect of Fish Oil Supplementation on Hepatic and Visceral Fat in Overweight Men: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Nutrients · 2019Trial
- Effect of Coenzyme QAmerican journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation · 2017Trial
- Coenzyme Q supplementation in pulmonary arterial hypertension.Redox biology · 2014Trial
- Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Cardiac Disease: The Fort Fell.Biomolecules · 2024Review
- An evaluation of the recommendations for primary nutrition research addressing noncommunicable disease using the EPICOT+ framework: A cross-sectional descriptive meta-research study of Cochrane nutrition systematic reviews.Cochrane evidence synthesis and methods · 2024Article
- Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Heart Failure: From Pathophysiological Mechanisms to Therapeutic Opportunities.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Combined Supplementation of Coenzyme QNutrients · 2022Review
- Key points for the development of antioxidant cocktails to prevent cellular stress and damage caused by reactive oxygen species (ROS) during manned space missions.NPJ microgravity · 2021Review
- Oxidative stress and inflammation: determinants of anthracycline cardiotoxicity and possible therapeutic targets.Heart failure reviews · 2021Review
- The Use of Coenzyme Q10 in Cardiovascular Diseases.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- CoenzymeQ in cellular redox regulation and clinical heart failure.Free radical biology & medicine · 2021Review
- Stability of Reduced and Oxidized Coenzyme Q10 in Finished Products.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Depleted Myocardial Coenzyme Q10 in Cavalier King Charles Spaniels with Congestive Heart Failure Due to Myxomatous Mitral Valve Disease.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Ferroptosis: New Dawn for Overcoming the Cardio-Cerebrovascular Diseases.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Updated by
Authors and funding
7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCoenzyme Q10, or ubiquinone, is a non-prescription nutritional supplement. It is a fat-soluble molecule that acts as an electron carrier in mitochondria and as a coenzyme for mitochondrial enzymes. Coenzyme Q10 deficiency may be associated with a multitude of diseases including heart failure. The severity of heart failure correlates with the severity of coenzyme Q10 deficiency. Emerging data suggest that the harmful effects of reactive oxygen species are increased in patients with heart failure and coenzyme Q10 may help to reduce these toxic effects because of its antioxidant activity. Coenzyme Q10 may also have a role in stabilising myocardial calcium-dependent ion channels and preventing the consumption of metabolites essential for adenosine-5'-triphosphate (ATP) synthesis. Coenzyme Q10, although not a primary recommended treatment, could be beneficial to patients with heart failure. Several randomised controlled trials have compared coenzyme Q10 to other therapeutic modalities, but no systematic review of existing randomised trials has been conducted.
objectivesTo review the safety and efficacy of coenzyme Q10 in heart failure. SEARCH
methodsWe searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (2012, Issue 12); MEDLINE OVID (1950 to January Week 3 2013) and EMBASE OVID (1980 to 2013 Week 03) on 24 January 2013; Web of Science with Conference Proceedings (1970 to January 2013) and CINAHL Plus (1981 to January 2013) on 25 January 2013; and AMED (Allied and Complementary Medicine) (1985 to January 2013) on 28 January 2013. We applied no language restrictions. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials of either parallel or cross-over design that assessed the beneficial and harmful effects of coenzyme Q10 in patients with heart failure. When cross-over studies were identified, we considered data only from the first phase. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently extracted data from the included studies onto a pre-designed data extraction form. We then entered the data into Review Manager 5.2 for analysis. We assessed study risk of bias using the Cochrane 'Risk of bias' tool. For dichotomous data, we calculated the risk ratio and for continuous data the mean difference (MD). Where appropriate data were available, we performed meta-analysis. For this review we prioritised data from pooled analyses only. Where meta-analysis was not possible, we wrote a narrative synthesis. We provided a QUOROM flow chart to show the flow of papers. MAIN
resultsWe included seven studies with 914 participants comparing conenzyme Q10 versus placebo. There were no data on clinical events from published randomised trials. The included studies had small sample sizes. Meta-analysis was only possible for a few physiological measures and there was substantial heterogeneity.Only one study reported on total mortality, major cardiovascular events and hospitalisation. Five trials reported on the New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification of clinical status, but it was impossible to pool data due to heterogeneity. None of the included trials considered quality of life, exercise variables, adverse events or cost-effectiveness as outcome measures. Pooled analysis suggests that the use of coenzyme Q10 has no clear effect on left ventricular ejection fraction (MD -2.26; 95% confidence interval (CI) -15.49 to 10.97, n = 60) or exercise capacity (MD 12.79; 95% CI -140.12 to 165.70, n = 85). Pooled data did indicate that supplementation increased blood levels of coenzyme Q10 (MD 1.46; 95% CI 1.19 to 1.72, n = 112). However, there are only a small number of small studies with a risk of bias, so these results should be interpreted with caution. AUTHORS'
conclusionsNo conclusions can be drawn on the benefits or harms of coenzyme Q10 in heart failure at this time as trials published to date lack information on clinically relevant endpoints. Furthermore, the existing data are derived from small, heterogeneous trials that concentrate on physiological measures: their results are inconclusive. Until further evidence emerges to support the use of coenzyme Q10 in heart failure, there might be a need to re-evaluate whether further trials testing coenzyme Q10 in heart failure are desirable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.