Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24048856›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2013

Persistent activity in prefrontal cortex during trace eyelid conditioning: dissociating responses that reflect cerebellar output from those that do not.

Jennifer J Siegel, Michael D Mauk

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer J SiegelCenter for Learning and Memory and the Department of Neuroscience, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712.
Michael D Mauk
Institute for Learning and Development · USThe University of Texas at Austin · US

Funding

REVERSIBLE LESIONS--CEREBELLAR MECHANISMS MOTOR LEARNINGR01MH046904 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI MAUK, MICHAEL D · 1997 to 2016
$5.5M
Forebrain-Cerebellum Interactions in Trace ConditioningR01MH074006 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI MAUK, MICHAEL D · 2005 to 2015
$3.3M
Neuronal Mechanisms for Working Memory in Prefrontal CortexR01MH094839 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI JOHNSTON, DANIEL, MAUK, MICHAEL D · 2011 to 2015
$1.9M
USING CLASSICAL CONDITIONING TO STUDY THE CEREBELLUMR29MH046904 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI MAUK, MICHAEL D · 1992 to 1996
–
NIMH NIH HHS MH46904NIMH NIH HHS MH74006NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH046904NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH074006NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH094839
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Persistent neural activity, responses that outlast the stimuli that evoke them, plays an important role in neural computations and possibly in processes, such as working memory. Recent studies suggest that trace eyelid conditioning, which involves a temporal gap between the conditioned and unconditioned stimuli (the trace interval), requires persistent neural activity in a region of medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC). This persistent activity, which could be conveyed to cerebellum via a pathway through pons, may engage the cerebellum and allow for the expression of conditioned responses. Given the substantial reciprocity observed among many brain regions, it is essential to demonstrate that persistent responses in mPFC neurons are not simply a reflection of cerebellar feedback to the forebrain, leaving open the possibility that such responses could serve as input to the cerebellum. This concern is highlighted by studies showing that hippocampal learning-related activity is abolished by cerebellar inactivation. We inactivated the cerebellum while recording single-unit activity from the mPFC of rabbits trained with a forebrain-dependent trace eyelid conditioning procedure. We report that, whereas the responses of cells that show an onset of increased spike activity during the trace interval were abolished by cerebellar inactivation, persistent responses that begin during the conditioned stimulus and persisted into the trace interval were unaffected. Therefore, conditioned stimulus-evoked persistent responses remain the strongest candidate input pattern to support the cerebellar expression of learned responses.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsBrain MappingCerebellumConditioning, ClassicalConditioning, EyelidGABA-A Receptor AgonistsMaleMuscimolNeural PathwaysNeuronsPrefrontal CortexRabbitsTime FactorsGABA-A Receptor AgonistsMuscimol

Identifiers

PMID24048856
PMCPMC3776068
OpenAlexW2099321652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.