Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24048726›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2014

The correlation between Clostridium-difficile infection and human gut concentrations of Bacteroidetes phylum and clostridial species.

E Goldberg, I Amir, M Zafran, U Gophna, Z Samra, S Pitlik, J Bishara

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Diabetes and gut microbiome.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Review
  7. Microbial ecology betweenBioscience of microbiota, food and health · 2023
    Review
  8. Review
  9. The role of the gut microbiome in colonization resistance and recurrentTherapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2022
    Review
  10. Clostridioides difficile and the Microbiota Early in Life.Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society · 2021
    Review
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Preventive Effects ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Frontiers in microbiology · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

E GoldbergInfectious Diseases Unit, Rabin Medical center, Beilinson Hospital, 39 Jaboutinski St, Petach-Tikva, 49100, Israel, eladgol310@yahoo.com.
I Amir
M Zafran
U Gophna
Z Samra
S Pitlik
J Bishara
Rabin Medical Center · ILTel Aviv University · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We aimed to assess differences in bacterial intensities of Bacteroidetes phylum and different clostridial species in the human intestines with respect to C. difficile infection. Patients with a stool assay for C. difficile toxin were identified via the microbiology laboratory in our institute. Bacterial populations were quantified from stool samples of four groups of patients: Group I-patients with C. difficile associated diarrhea (CDAD); Group II-asymptomatic C. difficile carriers; Group III-patients with non-C. difficile diarrhea; Group IV-patients with no diarrhea and negative stool samples for the C. difficile toxin (control group). Stool was examined for three genes-C. difficile toxin A gene, 16S rRNA gene from Clostridium thermocellum representing other clostridial species, and 16S rRNA gene from Bacteroides fragilis representing the Bacteroidetes phylum. Fifty-nine patients underwent analysis of the stool (CDAD group 14, carriers group 14, non-C. difficile diarrhea group 16, control group 15). C. difficile concentration was highest in the CDAD group, followed by the carriers group. Higher concentrations of both clostridial species and Bacteriodetes were observed in the control and non-C. difficile diarrhea groups compared to the CDAD and carriers groups. We demonstrated an inverse association between infection with C. difficile and the abundance of Bacteroidetes phylum and other clostridial species in human intestines. Studies with larger samples and broader diagnostic procedures are needed in order to better explore and understand this association.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBacterial LoadBacteroidetesCarrier StateClostridioides difficileClostridiumClostridium InfectionsFecesFemaleGastrointestinal TractHumansMaleProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID24048726
OpenAlexW1970866779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.