Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24048618›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2013

Geographic location of antiretroviral clinical trials in HIV infected pediatric patients.

Katie J Suda, Jodie Greene, Chasity M Shelton

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Katie J SudaUniversity of Tennessee Health Science Center, 881 Madison Avenue, #340, Memphis, TN, 38163, USA, ksuda@uthsc.edu.
Jodie Greene
Chasity M Shelton

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSome medicines regulatory authorities are encouraging research in pediatrics. However, children are a vulnerable population, and previous studies have suggested that research is increasingly being conducted outside of developed countries.

objectiveThe purpose of this study is to determine the location of trials in the pediatric population with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).

settingNot applicable.

methodsClinical trials registered in the largest international clinical trials registry (clinicaltrials.gov) evaluating antiretrovirals in pediatric HIV infected patients were included. Data were collected on the location, funding, study purpose, design, initiation date, age of subjects, and medication classes tested.

main outcome measuresWe assessed frequencies of characteristics of pediatric HIV trials registered in the clinicaltrials.gov database.

resultsOverall, 288 studies were included in the analysis. Most trials were conducted in ages 12-17 years (83 %), followed by studies in those <6 years (25 %) and 6-11 years (21 %). The location of most trials included at least one site in developed countries (83 %). The number of trials completed exclusively in developing countries increased from 1989 to 2011.

conclusionsThe majority of pediatric antiretroviral trials registered in clinicaltrials.gov were conducted in adolescent subjects in developed countries. The number of pediatric HIV studies in developing countries increased while studies conducted in developed countries decreased similar to trends of HIV.

Indexed as

PediatricsAdolescentAge FactorsAnti-HIV AgentsChildChild, PreschoolClinical Trials as TopicDeveloped CountriesDeveloping CountriesHIV InfectionsHumansRegistriesAnti-HIV Agents

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.