Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24048615›Full record

ArticleBMJ quality & safety2013

Diagnostic errors: moving beyond 'no respect' and getting ready for prime time.

Hardeep Singh

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ quality & safety, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Strategies to reduce diagnostic errors: a systematic review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Patient involvement in diagnosing cancer in primary care: a systematic review of current interventions.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Stroke Chameleons and Stroke Mimics in the Emergency Department.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2017
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Hardeep Singh

Funding

Using Electronic Data to Improve Care of Patients with Known or Suspected CancerR18HS017820 · AHRQ · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI SINGH, HARDEEP · 2008 to 2010
$1.2M
Reducing Missed And Delayed Diagnoses In Cancer: Lessons From AviationK23CA125585 · NCI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI SINGH, HARDEEP · 2007 to 2011
$709k
A Multiyear Grant to Support the Diagnostic Error in Medicine (DEM) Annual ConferR13HS019252 · AHRQ · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI NEWMAN-TOKER, DAVID · 2010 to 2012
$265k
AHRQ HHS R13 HS019252AHRQ HHS R13 HS19252-01AHRQ HHS R18 HS017820AHRQ HHS R18HS017820NCI NIH HHS K23 CA125585NCI NIH HHS K23CA125585
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Health PrioritiesCongresses as TopicDiagnostic ErrorsHumansUnited StatesAccreditationAdverse events, epidemiology and detectionAmbulatory care

Identifiers

PMID24048615
PMCPMC3786612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.