Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24048578›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2013

Inhibitory effects of topical cyclosporine A 0.05% on immune-mediated corneal neovascularization in rabbits.

Yasin Yücel Bucak, Mesut Erdurmus, Elçin Hakan Terzi, Aysel Kükner, Serdal Çelebi

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yasin Yücel BucakOphthalmology Clinic, Izzet Baysal State Hospital, Bolu, Turkey.
Mesut Erdurmus
Elçin Hakan Terzi
Aysel Kükner
Serdal Çelebi
Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe aimed to study the inhibitory effects of topical cyclosporine A (CsA) 0.05% on immune-mediated corneal neovascularization, and to compare its efficacy with those of dexamethasone 0.1% and bevacizumab 0.5%.

methodsImmune-mediated corneal neovascularization was created in 36 right eyes of 36 rabbits. The rabbits were then randomized into four groups. Group I received CsA 0.05%, Group II received dexamethasone 0.1%, Group III received bevacizumab 0.5%, and Group IV received isotonic saline twice a day for 14 days. The corneal surface covered with neovascular vessels was measured on the photographs. The rabbits were then sacrificed and the corneas excised. Paraffin-embedded sections were stained with hematoxylin-eosin and terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP-biotin nick end labeling assay.

resultsThe means of percent area of corneal neovascularization in Group I, II, III, and IV were 24.4%, 5.9%, 37.1%, and 44.1%, respectively. The inhibitory effect of CsA 0.05% was found to be better than the effect found in the bevacizumab 0.5% and control groups (p = 0.03 and p = 0.02, respectively). CsA 0.05% was found to have significantly lesser inhibitory effects on corneal neovascularization than dexamethasone 0.1% (p < 0.001). Apoptotic cell density was higher in Group III and Group IV than in Group I and Group II. There was no difference between Group I and Group II in terms of apoptotic cell density (p = 0.7).

conclusionsTopical CsA 0.05% was shown to have an inhibitory effect on immune-mediated corneal neovascularization in rabbits.

Indexed as

Administration, TopicalAngiogenesis InhibitorsAnimalsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedApoptosisArthus ReactionBevacizumabBiotinCorneal NeovascularizationCyclosporineDeoxyuracil NucleotidesDexamethasoneDisease Models, AnimalGlucocorticoidsImmunoenzyme TechniquesImmunosuppressive Agents5-(3-(1-(5-(5-(biotinylamino)pentanamidomethyl)-2-nitrophenyl)ethoxycarbonylamino)propenyl)-2'-deoxyuracil 5'-triphosphateAngiogenesis InhibitorsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBevacizumabBiotinCyclosporineDeoxyuracil NucleotidesDexamethasoneGlucocorticoidsImmunosuppressive AgentsOphthalmic SolutionsSerum Albumin, Bovine

Identifiers

PMID24048578
OpenAlexW2064394531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.