Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24048502›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2014

Brain weight in completed suicide and other cases of death-comparison of recent and previous studies.

B Zedler, B Flaig, H Ackermann, M Parzeller, H Bratzke

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Forensic tissue mechanics of diabetes mellitus-related brain induration.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2026
    Article
  2. Forensic neuropathology in the past decade: a scoping literature review.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

B ZedlerInstitute of Legal Medicine, Goethe University of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany, zedler@em.uni-frankfurt.de.
B Flaig
H Ackermann
M Parzeller
H Bratzke
Goethe University Frankfurt · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe weight of human brains is subject of numerous scientific research studies particularly in anatomy, pathology, and forensic medicine. Just a few investigations deal with a possible correlation between psychiatric disorders, especially suicidality, and brain weight. The results are contradictory.

aimsThis study aims to find out if postmortem brain weight is higher in suicide victims considering the discrepancies of previous studies.

methodIn a retrospective study, the weight of brains obtained by autopsies performed in the Institute of Legal Medicine in Frankfurt, Germany, was evaluated. Data of 99 suicide cases (64 males, 35 females) were compared with those obtained from similar number cases of sudden death in a matched pair analysis. In each case, body weight, height, and body mass index were also taken into account.

resultsNo significant differences in brain weight were found in suicide victims compared to those of the control group.

conclusionsThe brain weight depends on various parameters such as gender, age, body height, and weight. The selection criteria for suicide cases as well as for the corresponding control population are essential in evaluating the brain weight in suicide.

Indexed as

Cause of DeathAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsBody HeightBody WeightBrainDeath, SuddenFemaleHumansMaleMatched-Pair AnalysisMiddle AgedOrgan SizeReference Values

Identifiers

PMID24048502
OpenAlexW2033010154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.