Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24048289›Full record

ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2013

Plasticity of the human olfactory system: the olfactory bulb.

Caroline Huart, Philippe Rombaux, Thomas Hummel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Olfactory network reorganization in Parkinson's disease.Parkinsonism & related disorders · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Surgical Approaches for Possible Positions of an Olfactory Implant to Stimulate the Olfactory Bulb.ORL; journal for oto-rhino-laryngology and its related specialties · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Investigations and Outcomes for Olfactory Disorders.Current otorhinolaryngology reports · 2022
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Caroline HuartDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels 1200, Belgium. caroline.huart@uclouvain.be.
Philippe Rombaux
Thomas Hummel

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the last years, an increasing interest has been paid to the olfactory system, particularly to its abilities of plasticity and its potential continuous neurogenesis throughout adult life. Although mechanisms underlying adult neurogenesis have been largely investigated in animals, to some degree they remain unclear in humans. Based on human research findings, the present review will focus on the olfactory bulb as an evidence of the astonishing plasticity of the human olfactory system.

Indexed as

Neuronal PlasticityAnimalsHumansNeurogenesisNeuronsOlfactory BulbOlfactory Perception

Identifiers

PMID24048289
PMCPMC6269828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.