Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24048144›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of obesity (2005)2014

Bariatric surgery in adolescents and young adults--safety and effectiveness in a cohort of 345 patients.

B S Lennerz, M Wabitsch, H Lippert, S Wolff, C Knoll, R Weiner, T Manger, W Kiess, C Stroh

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of obesity (2005), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Surgery for the treatment of obesity in children and adolescents.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Bariatric Surgery in Adolescents: To Do or Not to Do?Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Predictors of Postoperative Aftercare Attrition among Gastric Bypass Patients.Bariatric surgical practice and patient care · 2015
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

B S LennerzDivision of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Interdisciplinary Obesity Unit, Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University Medical Center, Ulm, Germany.
M WabitschDivision of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Interdisciplinary Obesity Unit, Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University Medical Center, Ulm, Germany.
H Lippert1] University Hospital for General-, Visceral-, and Vascular Surgery, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany [2] Institute for Quality Assurance in Surgical Medicine at the University Hospital, Magdeburg, Germany.
S WolffUniversity Hospital for General-, Visceral-, and Vascular Surgery, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
C KnollStatConsult Magdeburg, Research Institute for Clinical Research and Development, Magdeburg, Germany.
R WeinerKrankenhaus Sachsenhausen, Frankfurt.
T Manger1] Institute for Quality Assurance in Surgical Medicine at the University Hospital, Magdeburg, Germany [2] SRH Hospital for General, Visceral, and Pediatric Surgery, Wald-Klinikum Gera, Germany.
W KiessHospital for Children and Adolescents, Center of Pediatric Research, Leipzig, Germany.
C Stroh1] Institute for Quality Assurance in Surgical Medicine at the University Hospital, Magdeburg, Germany [2] SRH Hospital for General, Visceral, and Pediatric Surgery, Wald-Klinikum Gera, Germany.
SRH Wald-Klinikum Gera · DEUniversität Ulm · DEUniversity Hospital Magdeburg · DEKrankenhaus Sachsenhausen · DEOtto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine the safety and effectiveness of adolescent bariatric surgery and to improve treatment recommendations for this age group.

designProspective longitudinal registry. Since January 2005, patients undergoing bariatric surgery in Germany are enlisted in an online registry called 'study for quality assurance in obesity surgeries'. SUBJECTS: Adolescents and young adults up to the age of 21 years, operated from January 2005 to December 2010. MEASUREMENTS: Weight, BMI, comorbidities, complication rates.

resultsN=345 primary procedures were recorded by 58 hospitals. N=51 patients were under the age of 18 years. Follow-up information was available for 48% (n=167) of patients, with an average observation period of 544±412 days (median: 388 days). The most common surgical techniques were gastric banding (n=118, 34.2%), gastric bypass (n=116, 33.6%) and sleeve gastrectomy (n=78, 22.6%). Short-term complications (intra-operative; general postoperative; specific postoperative) were slightly lower for gastric banding (0.8%; 2.5%; 0.8%) than for gastric bypass (2.6%; 5.2%; 1.7%) or sleeve gastrectomy (0%; 9.0%; 7.7%). In accordance with published findings, weight and BMI reduction were lower for gastric banding (-28 kg; -9.5 kg m(-2)) compared to gastric bypass (-50 kg; -16.4 kg m(-2)) P< 0.001 or sleeve gastrectomy (-46 kg; -15.4 kg m(-2)) P< 0.001. Outcomes did not differ between the <18 and ≥18-year-old patients.

conclusionLike in adults, bariatric surgery has low short-term complication rates and results in sustained weight loss in adolescents. However, the missing long-term observations prohibit a final conclusion about lasting effectiveness and safety. Clinical trials with structured follow-up programs and mechanisms to ascertain patient adherences are needed.

Indexed as

GastrectomyGastric BypassWeight LossAdolescentComorbidityFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGermanyHumansMaleObesity, MorbidOutcome Assessment, Health CarePatient SelectionProspective StudiesRegistriesRemission Induction

Identifiers

PMID24048144
OpenAlexW1970413710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.