ArticleEndocrinology2013
Policy decisions on endocrine disruptors should be based on science across disciplines: a response to Dietrich et al.
Article in Endocrinology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- A proposed framework for the systematic review and integrated assessment (SYRINA) of endocrine disrupting chemicals.Environmental health : a global access science source · 2016Pooled it
- Using systematic reviews for hazard and risk assessment of endocrine disrupting chemicals.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2015Pooled it
- Endocrine disrupting chemicals: Impact on human health, wildlife and the environment.Science progress · 2019Review
- Metabolism disrupting chemicals and metabolic disorders.Reproductive toxicology (Elmsford, N.Y.) · 2017Review
- Scientific Issues Relevant to Setting Regulatory Criteria to Identify Endocrine-Disrupting Substances in the European Union.Environmental health perspectives · 2016Article
- Article
- Associations of plasma concentrations of dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene and polychlorinated biphenyls with prostate cancer: a case-control study in Guadeloupe (French West Indies).Environmental health perspectives · 2015Article
- A path forward in the debate over health impacts of endocrine disrupting chemicals.Environmental health : a global access science source · 2014Article
- Science, policy, and the transparency of values.Environmental health perspectives · 2014Article
- Science and policy: understanding the role of value judgments.Environmental health perspectives · 2014Article
- Should oral gavage be abandoned in toxicity testing of endocrine disruptors?Environmental health : a global access science source · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
33 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.