Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24047876›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2013

Contact inhibition of locomotion probabilities drive solitary versus collective cell migration.

Ravi A Desai, Smitha B Gopal, Sophia Chen, Christopher S Chen

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 98 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Synthetic living materials in cancer biology.Nature reviews bioengineering · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Learning the dynamics of cell-cell interactions in confined cell migration.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Rules of collective migration: from the wildebeest to the neural crest.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Ravi A DesaiDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Smitha B Gopal
Sophia Chen
Christopher S Chen
University of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Cadherins, integrins, and mechanochemical signalingR01HL073305 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI CHEN, CHRISTOPHER S · 2003 to 2011
$3.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS HL073305NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL073305
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Contact inhibition of locomotion (CIL) is the process whereby cells collide, cease migrating in the direction of the collision, and repolarize their migration machinery away from the collision. Quantitative analysis of CIL has remained elusive because cell-to-cell collisions are infrequent in traditional cell culture. Moreover, whereas CIL predicts mutual cell repulsion and 'scattering' of cells, the same cells in vivo are observed to undergo CIL at some developmental times and collective cell migration at others. It remains unclear whether CIL is simply absent during collective cell migration, or if the two processes coexist and are perhaps even related. Here, we used micropatterned stripes of extracellular matrix to restrict cell migration to linear paths such that cells polarized in one of two directions and collisions between cells occurred frequently and consistently, permitting quantitative and unbiased analysis of CIL. Observing repolarization events in different contexts, including head-to-head collision, head-to-tail collision, collision with an inert barrier, or no collision, and describing polarization as a two-state transition indicated that CIL occurs probabilistically, and most strongly upon head-to-head collisions. In addition to strong CIL, we also observed 'trains' of cells moving collectively with high persistence that appeared to emerge from single cells. To reconcile these seemingly conflicting observations of CIL and collective cell migration, we constructed an agent-based model to simulate our experiments. Our model quantitatively predicted the emergence of collective migration, and demonstrated the sensitivity of such emergence to the probability of CIL. Thus CIL and collective migration can coexist, and in fact a shift in CIL probabilities may underlie transitions between solitary cell migration and collective cell migration. Taken together, our data demonstrate the emergence of persistently polarized, collective cell movement arising from CIL between colliding cells.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell CommunicationCell LineCell MovementContact InhibitionExtracellular MatrixHumanscell–cell adhesioncell migrationcell polarizationcontact inhibition of locomotionmicropatterning

Identifiers

PMID24047876
PMCPMC3785843
OpenAlexW2124774068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.