Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24047817›Full record

Trial reportHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2014

A phase II study of an investigational tetravalent influenza vaccine formulation combining MF59®: adjuvanted, pre-pandemic, A/H5N1 vaccine and trivalent seasonal influenza vaccine in healthy adults.

Karl-Heinz Herbinger, Frank von Sonnenburg, Hans Dieter Nothdurft, Pamela Perona, Astrid Borkowski, Elena Fragapane, Uwe Nicolay, Ralf Clemens

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Prevention of Emerging Infections in Children.Pediatric clinics of North America · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Karl-Heinz HerbingerDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine; University Hospital; Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München; Munich, Germany.
Frank von SonnenburgDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine; University Hospital; Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München; Munich, Germany.
Hans Dieter NothdurftDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine; University Hospital; Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München; Munich, Germany.
Pamela PeronaDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine; University Hospital; Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München; Munich, Germany.
Astrid BorkowskiNovartis Vaccines & Diagnostics; Cambridge, MA USA.
Elena FragapaneNovartis Vaccines & Diagnostics; Cambridge, MA USA.
Uwe NicolayNovartis Vaccines & Diagnostics; Cambridge, MA USA.
Ralf ClemensNovartis Vaccines & Diagnostics; Cambridge, MA USA.
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DENovartis (Germany) · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An investigational tetravalent vaccine combining pre-pandemic, MF59®-adjuvanted A/H5N1 vaccine with non-adjuvanted, trivalent, seasonal influenza vaccine has been developed, which has the potential to be used for pre-pandemic priming and to improve levels of compliance and coverage. It is important to determine whether the safety and immunogenicity of the combination vaccine is equivalent to that of the two separate vaccines when administered concomitantly. Healthy adults (n=601) were randomly assigned to three vaccination groups to receive either: (1) tetravalent vaccine and placebo concomitantly (in separate arms) on Day 1, followed by A/H5N1 vaccine on Day 22; (2) A/H5N1 vaccine and placebo concomitantly on Day 1, followed by tetravalent vaccine on Day 22; or (3) A/H5N1 and seasonal vaccines concomitantly on Day 1, followed by A/H5N1 vaccine on Day 22. Antibody responses were measured using single radial hemolysis (SRH), haemagglutination inhibition (HI), and microneutralization (MN) assays on Days 1, 22, and 43. Solicited adverse reactions were recorded for seven days after vaccination. Spontaneous adverse events were recorded throughout the study. The tetravalent vaccine elicited antibody titers equivalent to those for separate A/H5N1 and seasonal vaccines, and sufficient to meet the European licensure criteria against A/H5N1 and all three seasonal strains. Local and systemic reactions were mainly mild to moderate. No vaccine-related serious adverse events occurred. These findings demonstrate that MF59-adjuvanted A/H5N1 and seasonal influenza vaccines had an acceptable safety profile and could be effectively administered as a tetravalent formulation, supporting the possibility of integrating pre-pandemic priming into seasonal influenza vaccination programs.

Indexed as

Adjuvants, ImmunologicInfluenza A Virus, H1N1 SubtypeInfluenza A Virus, H3N2 SubtypeInfluenza A Virus, H5N1 SubtypeInfluenza B virusInfluenza VaccinesPolysorbatesSqualeneAdolescentAdultAntibodies, ViralDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsFemaleHealthy VolunteersHemagglutination Inhibition TestsHumansAdjuvants, ImmunologicAntibodies, ViralInfluenza VaccinesMF59 oil emulsionPolysorbatesSqualeneH5N1influenza vaccineMF59pandemicseasonal influenza

Identifiers

PMID24047817
PMCPMC4181038
OpenAlexW1965424079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.