Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24047615›Full record

ArticleEmerging infectious diseases2013

Use of primary care data for detecting impetigo trends, United kingdom, 1995-2010.

Laura J Shallcross, Irene Petersen, Joe Rosenthal, Anne M Johnson, Nick Freemantle, Andrew C Hayward

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Emerging infectious diseases, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Laura J Shallcross
Irene Petersen
Joe Rosenthal
Anne M Johnson
Nick Freemantle
Andrew C Hayward

Funding

Medical Research Council G0501879Medical Research Council MR/K006584/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Using a primary care database, we identified a major increase in impetigo in the United Kingdom during 1995-2010. Despite a doubled rate of primary care consultations, this increase was not identified by routine surveillance. Primary care databases are a valuable and underused source of surveillance data on infectious diseases.

Indexed as

EpidemicsAdolescentAnti-Bacterial AgentsChildChild, PreschoolEpidemiological MonitoringFusidic AcidHumansImpetigoInfantPrimary Health CareUnited KingdomAnti-Bacterial AgentsFusidic Acidbacteriaepidemiologyimpetigoprimary careStaphylococcus aureusUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID24047615
PMCPMC3810750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.