Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24047604›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in rheumatology2013

Measuring response in the gastrointestinal tract in systemic sclerosis.

Dinesh Khanna, Vivek Nagaraja, Heather Gladue, William Chey, Mark Pimentel, Tracy Frech

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in rheumatology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Validation of the Portuguese Version of the Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dinesh KhannaaUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan bCedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California cUniversity of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Vivek Nagaraja
Heather Gladue
William Chey
Mark Pimentel
Tracy Frech

Funding

Development and Initial Validation of PROMIS GI Distress ScaleU01AR057936 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI KHANNA, DINESH, SPIEGEL, BRENNAN · 2009 to 2013
$2.2M
Outcomes Research in Rheumatic DiseasesK24AR063120 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI KHANNA, DINESH · 2012 to 2022
$1.6M
NIAMS NIH HHS K24 AR063120NIAMS NIH HHS U01 AR057936
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewGastrointestinal tract (GIT) involvement in systemic sclerosis (scleroderma, SSc) is the most common internal complication. This review discusses the outcome measures to capture GIT involvement in clinical care and trials. RECENT

findingsPatient-reported outcome measures have been validated (UCLA Scleroderma Clinical Trial Consortium GIT 2.0 and NIH PROMIS scales) in SSc-GIT. Multiple objective measures are available to assess mucosal involvement and motility in GIT. However, these need to be validated in SSc for trials. SUMMARY: GIT is a common cause of morbidity and has negative impact on quality of life in SSc. Recommendations are given for trial design and evaluation of GIT involvement in SSc.

Indexed as

Diagnostic Techniques, Digestive SystemGastrointestinal DiseasesHumansPrognosisQuality of LifeScleroderma, SystemicSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID24047604
PMCPMC3880116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.