Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24047323›Full record

ArticleNeural computation2013

Reinforcement learning of two-joint virtual arm reaching in a computer model of sensorimotor cortex.

Samuel A Neymotin, George L Chadderdon, Cliff C Kerr, Joseph T Francis, William W Lytton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neural computation, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Chance, long tails, and inference in a non-Gaussian, Bayesian theory of vocal learning in songbirds.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Towards real-time communication betweenJournal of computational surgery · 2014
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Samuel A NeymotinDepartment of Neurobiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510, U.S.A., and Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, SUNY Downstate, Brooklyn, NY 11203, U.S.A. samuel.neymotin@yale.edu.
George L Chadderdon
Cliff C Kerr
Joseph T Francis
William W Lytton

Funding

Extension of NEURON simulator for simulation of reaction-diffusion in neuronsR01MH086638 · NIMH · SUNY DOWNSTATE MEDICAL CENTER · PI LYTTON, WILLIAM W, MCDOUGAL, ROBERT A. · 2010 to 2025
$6.0M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH086638
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neocortical mechanisms of learning sensorimotor control involve a complex series of interactions at multiple levels, from synaptic mechanisms to cellular dynamics to network connectomics. We developed a model of sensory and motor neocortex consisting of 704 spiking model neurons. Sensory and motor populations included excitatory cells and two types of interneurons. Neurons were interconnected with AMPA/NMDA and GABAA synapses. We trained our model using spike-timing-dependent reinforcement learning to control a two-joint virtual arm to reach to a fixed target. For each of 125 trained networks, we used 200 training sessions, each involving 15 s reaches to the target from 16 starting positions. Learning altered network dynamics, with enhancements to neuronal synchrony and behaviorally relevant information flow between neurons. After learning, networks demonstrated retention of behaviorally relevant memories by using proprioceptive information to perform reach-to-target from multiple starting positions. Networks dynamically controlled which joint rotations to use to reach a target, depending on current arm position. Learning-dependent network reorganization was evident in both sensory and motor populations: learned synaptic weights showed target-specific patterning optimized for particular reach movements. Our model embodies an integrative hypothesis of sensorimotor cortical learning that could be used to interpret future electrophysiological data recorded in vivo from sensorimotor learning experiments. We used our model to make the following predictions: learning enhances synchrony in neuronal populations and behaviorally relevant information flow across neuronal populations, enhanced sensory processing aids task-relevant motor performance and the relative ease of a particular movement in vivo depends on the amount of sensory information required to complete the movement.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceComputer SimulationArmHumansPsychomotor PerformanceSomatosensory Cortex

Identifiers

PMID24047323
PMCPMC4291321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.