ArticleJournal of medical systems2013
Quality and cost improvement of healthcare via complementary measurement and diagnosis of patient general health outcome using electronic health record data: research rationale and design.
Article in Journal of medical systems, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The emerging literature for the triad of health informatics, healthcare quality and safety, and healthcare simulation.Health systems (Basingstoke, England) · 2019Article
- The development of an automated ward independent delirium risk prediction model.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2016Article
- Opioid prescribing by physicians with and without electronic health records.Journal of medical systems · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this evolving 'third era of health', one of the US Health Care Reform Act's goals is to effectively facilitate the primary care physician's ability to better diagnose and manage the health outcome of the outpatient. That goal must include research on the complementary quantitative-qualitative assessment and rating of the patient's health status. This paper proposes an overview of the rationale and design of a research program for a balanced measurement and diagnostic clinical decision support system (CDSS) of the changing general health status of the patient -including disease- using electronic health record (EHR) data. The rationale, objectives, health metric-diagnostic tools architecture, simulation-optimization, and clinical trials are outlined. Resources, time frames, costs, feasibility, healthcare benefits and data-integration of the project are delineated. The basis and components of the research program to achieve an automated-CDSS to complement physician's clinical judgment, calculating a mathematical 'health equation' from each patient's EHR database, assisting physician-patient collaboration to diagnose, and improve general health outcomes is described. Use of multiple dimensional index, ways of classification, and causal factors' assessments, to arrive at the EHR-based CDSS algorithm-software providing a general health level and state rating of the patient are proposed. Its application could provide a compass for the general practitioner's best choice and use of the myriad of healthcare educational and technological options available with lower costs for everyday clinical practice and research. It could advance the approaches and focus of the 'eras of diseases', to the promising 'era of health', in an integrated, general approach to 'health.'
Indexed as
Identifiers
24046235What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.