ReviewInternational urology and nephrology2014
Vascular access for hemodialysis: postoperative evaluation and function monitoring.
Review in International urology and nephrology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Occlusion and Vascular Malformation Solved by a Novel Recanalization Management in a Hemodialysis Patient: A Case Report.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
- Reassessing the utility of access recirculation and Kt/V for the prediction of arteriovenous fistula failure using online clearance monitoring: the SHUNT STUDY.Journal of nephrology · 2023Observational
- Quality indicators of vascular access procedures for hemodialysis.International urology and nephrology · 2021Review
- Unexpected restoration of an arteriovenous graft function: the significance of vascular access surveillance.CEN case reports · 2020Article
- Assessing the Level of Patient-Specific Treatment Recommendations in Clinical Practice Guidelines for Hemodialysis Vascular Access in the United States.American health & drug benefits · 2018Article
- Prediction of hemodialysis vascular access failure using segmental bioimpedance analysis parameters.International urology and nephrology · 2018Article
- Neuromuscular electrostimulation: a new therapeutic option to improve radio-cephalic arteriovenous fistula maturation in end-stage chronic kidney disease patients.International urology and nephrology · 2017Article
- Effectiveness of beraprost sodium in maintaining vascular access patency in patients on hemodialysis.International urology and nephrology · 2017Article
- Calcification in arteriovenous fistula blood vessels may predict arteriovenous fistula failure: a 5-year follow-up study.International urology and nephrology · 2017Article
- Diagnostic value of computerized tomography venography in detecting stenosis and occlusion of subclavian vein and superior vena in chronic renal failure patients.Electronic physician · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vascular access (VA) survival is a crucial issue associated with morbidity and mortality of patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis. The development of stenosis is the major factor that leads to VA failure. Strategies for early detection of lesions within a VA system before serious complications arise are therefore crucial. The implementation of a VA surveillance program could lead to timely detection of VA dysfunction and referral for correction, reduction in central venous catheter use and decrease in hospitalization and VA-related cost. Suggested methods for arteriovenous fistulae and grafts surveillance include blood flow measurement, static pressure evaluation and duplex ultrasonography. Physical examination is an accepted method in contrast to nonstandardized dynamic pressure measurement for grafts. Access recirculation (not urea based) and dynamic pressure measurements are accepted methods for fistulae. Decreasing URR or Kt/V (otherwise unexplained) and increased (negative) arterial pressure in the dialysis machine are methods of limited sensitivity and specificity for both fistulae and grafts. Measurement of access blood flow has been proposed as the gold standard for the screening of all types of VA. Access flow can be measured by various techniques which are direct or indirect. Several studies about VA surveillance programs have demonstrated conflicting results. Larger, randomized controlled trials need to be carried out in order to clarify whether surveillance programs are necessary and which is the best surveillance strategy for each type of VA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.