ReviewDer Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft2013
[Pharmacological approach to treatment of proliferative vitreoretinopathy].
Review in Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Proliferative vitreoretinopathy prophylaxis : Mission (im)possible].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2021Review
- Effects of bradykinin on TGF‑β1‑induced epithelial‑mesenchymal transition in ARPE‑19 cells.Molecular medicine reports · 2018Article
- Comparison of the effects of intravitreal bevacizumab and dexamethasone in experimental posterior penetrating eye injury.International journal of ophthalmology · 2018Article
- Proteome-wide Identification of Glycosylation-dependent Interactors of Galectin-1 and Galectin-3 on Mesenchymal Retinal Pigment Epithelial (RPE) Cells.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2017Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) is the major cause of persistent loss of vision after retinal detachment surgery and is characterized by the formation of scar-like fibrocellular membranes on the neuroretina giving rise to tractional retinal (re-)detachment. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition, adhesion, migration and proliferation of retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) cells disseminated from the normal site at Bruch's membrane in concert with an activation of glial cells, hyalocytes and immune cells are key cellular events in the onset of the disease. The interplay between the cellular events and various growth factors, cytokines and matrix proteins thereby drives the undesirable formation of PVR membranes. Blocking these pathological events would greatly enhance the overall prognosis of surgical treatment. Clinical trials assessing the efficacy of antiproliferative and anti-inflammatory substances have yielded mixed results. Thus no safe or sufficiently effective pharmacological agent has so far been established in the clinical routine. Recent advances in the fundamental understanding of the pathogenesis of PVR aided in the identification of several new therapeutic targets to block the cellular events intrinsic to the disease. This article gives an overview of the results for adjunct therapies already tested in clinical studies and highlights experimental concepts for novel treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.