SynthesisTumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine2014
Quantitative assessment of the association between TP53 Arg72Pro polymorphism and risk of glioma.
Synthesis in Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of the p53 Arg72Pro polymorphism and its association with cancer risk: a HuGE review and meta-analysis.Genetics research · 2015Pooled it
- Feasibility and safety of prophylactic tentorium cerebelli hiatus incision in surgery of glioma located in lateral fissure area.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2015Article
- Adult brain cancer in the U.S. black population: a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) analysis of incidence, survival, and trends.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many studies have investigated on the association between TP53 Arg72Pro polymorphism and risk of glioma, but the impact of TP53 Arg72Pro polymorphism on glioma risk is unclear owing to the obvious inconsistence among those studies. To shed light on these inconclusive findings and get a quantitative assessment of the association between the TP53 Arg72Pro polymorphism and risk of glioma, we conducted a meta-analysis of eligible studies. We searched PubMed and Embase databases for studies investigating on the association between the TP53 Arg72Pro polymorphism and risk of glioma. The pooled odds ratios (OR) with their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) was calculated to assess the association between the TP53 Arg72Pro polymorphism and risk of glioma. A total of 12 studies were finally included into the meta-analysis. Meta-analysis of the 12 studies showed that TP53 Arg72Pro polymorphism was not associated with the risk of glioma (OR(Pro vs. Arg) = 1.07, 95% CI 0.93∼1.22; OR(ProPro vs. ArgArg) = 1.02, 95% CI 0.85∼1.22; OR(ProPro/ArgPro vs. ArgArg )= 1.06, 95% CI 0.85∼1.34; and OR(ProPro vs. ArgArg/ArgPro) = 1.07, 95% CI 0.91∼1.27). Subgroup analyses by ethnicity further identified that TP53 Arg72Pro polymorphism was not associated with the risk of glioma in Caucasians. However, there was a mild association between the TP53 Arg72Pro polymorphism and risk of glioma in Asians (OR(ProPro vs. ArgArg/ArgPro) = 1.42, 95% CI 1.00∼2.02). Thus, there is limited evidence for the association between the TP53 Arg72Pro polymorphism and risk of glioma, and more studies are needed to provide a more comprehensive assessment of the association in Asians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.