ArticleJournal of mathematical biology2014
Ultrasensitivity in independent multisite systems.
Article in Journal of mathematical biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Phenotypic heterogeneity in human genetic diseases: ultrasensitivity-mediated threshold effects as a unifying molecular mechanism.Journal of biomedical science · 2023Review
- The effect of site-to-site variability in ultrasensitive dose responses.Journal of mathematical biology · 2017Article
- Stochastic modeling suggests that noise reduces differentiation efficiency by inducing a heterogeneous drug response in glioma differentiation therapy.BMC systems biology · 2016Article
- A Hierarchical Mechanism of RIG-I Ubiquitination Provides Sensitivity, Robustness and Synergy in Antiviral Immune Responses.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Kinetic regulation of multi-ligand binding proteins.BMC systems biology · 2016Article
- Compact modeling of allosteric multisite proteins: application to a cell size checkpoint.PLoS computational biology · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multisite modifications are widely recognized as an essential feature of many switch-like responses in signal transduction. It is usually assumed that the modification of one site directly or indirectly increases the rate of modification of neighboring sites. In this paper we provide a new set of assumptions for a multisite system to become highly ultrasensitive even in the absence of cooperativity or allostery. We assume that the individual sites are modified independently of each other, and that protein activity is an ultrasensitive function of the fraction of modified sites. These assumptions are particularly useful in the context of multisite systems with a large (8+) number of sites. We estimate the apparent Hill coefficient of the dose responses in the sequential and nonsequential cases, highlight their different qualitative properties, and discuss a formula to approximate dose responses in the nonsequential case. As an example we describe a model of bacterial chemotaxis that features robust ultrasensitivity and perfect adaptation over a wide range of ligand concentrations, based on non-allosteric multisite behavior at the level of receptors and flagella. We also include a model of the inactivation of the yeast pheromone protein Ste5 by cell cycle proteins.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24046085What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.