ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2013
Results of a questionnaire regarding practice patterns for the diagnosis and treatment of intracranial radiation necrosis after SRS.
Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Treatment of pediatric cerebral radiation necrosis: a systematic review.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2016Pooled it
- Predicting Radionecrosis After Stereotactic Radiation Therapy for Solitary Brain Metastases: External Validation of a Univariable Model and Development of a Multivariable Model.Advances in radiation oncology · 2025Article
- Long-term impact of bevacizumab for the treatment of brain radiation necrosis.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2025Article
- Classifying Stereotactic Radiosurgery Patients by Primary Diagnosis Using Natural Language Processing of Clinical Notes.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2025Article
- Lung cancer with brain metastases remaining in continuous complete remission due to pembrolizumab and temozolomide: a case report.Annals of translational medicine · 2022Article
- Current emerging MRI tools for radionecrosis and pseudoprogression diagnosis.Current opinion in oncology · 2021Review
- Single- and Multifraction Stereotactic Radiosurgery Dose/Volume Tolerances of the Brain.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2021Review
- Ultra-Low-Dose Bevacizumab For Cerebral Radiation Necrosis: A Prospective Phase II Clinical Study.OncoTargets and therapy · 2019Article
- Angiotensin receptor blockade: a novel approach for symptomatic radiation necrosis after stereotactic radiosurgery.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2018Article
- Exploration of the recurrence in radiation brain necrosis after bevacizumab discontinuation.Oncotarget · 2016Article
- A study on the evaluation method and recent clinical efficacy of bevacizumab on the treatment of radiation cerebral necrosis.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Article
- Impact of provider level, training and gender on the utilization of palliative care and hospice in neuro-oncology: a North-American survey.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2016Article
- International patterns of palliative care in neuro-oncology: a survey of physician members of the Asian Society for Neuro-Oncology, the European Association of Neuro-Oncology, and the Society for Neuro-Oncology.Neuro-oncology practice · 2015Article
- Stereotactic radiosurgery to the resection cavity for brain metastases: prognostic factors and outcomes.Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT · 2015Article
- Changes in protein level in the cerebrospinal fluid of a patient with cerebral radiation necrosis treated with bevacizumab.Clinical Medicine Insights. Oncology · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an effective treatment option for patients with brain tumors, its increased use has raised concern for increased incidence of radiation necrosis (RN). No established standard or guidelines exists regarding non-invasive techniques to diagnose or treat RN. This study was conducted to assess current patterns of evaluation and treatment of RN among physicians who treat intracranial malignancies. A questionnaire consisting of 20 questions was sent to 3,041 members of the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) and the Society for Neurologic Oncology (SNO). Questions addressed demographics, utilization of SRS, perceptions regarding RN diagnosis treatment, approach to steroid-refractory RN, and management of two clinical scenarios using Kwiksurvey© software. The survey response rate was 8.74 % (266/3,041). Most respondents practice in an academic and/or university setting (62 %) at a facility that performs SRS (94 %) with a variety of systems. The number of annual cases performed at the participant's institution varied from <50 to >400, with a wide degree of variability. Most respondents practice at an institution that performs 50-100 cases/year (28 %). The most common range of symptomatic RN seen in clinical practice was 1-5 % (61 %). Most respondents reported that asymptomatic RN occurs in 6-10 % (33 %). Favored non-invasive diagnostic mechanisms were clinical evaluation (37 %) and MRI (19 %). In response to a clinical scenario depicting an asymptomatic patient post-SRS for brain metastasis with an enlarging lesion and edema at the treatment site, most respondents felt the image represented RN or a combination of RN and tumor progression. Most (58 %) favored short-term follow-up with repeat MRI. Ninety-three percent of the respondents initiated steroids as a first-line approach if patient was to develop symptoms. Steroids were the preferred first therapy in symptomatic patients on initial follow-up (81 %). In steroid-refractory patients, most recommend surgical intervention (63 %). Most physicians who responded to this questionnaire believe that post-SRS RN is uncommon (≤10 % of cases). The approach to establish the diagnosis of RN is variable. Steroids are the most commonly utilized first-line treatment for suspected RN. Considerable variation exists in the management of steroid-refractory RN. Additional studies are required to establish guidelines for evaluation and treatment of RN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.