Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24045666›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2013

EGFR inhibitors augment antitumour helper T-cell responses of HER family-specific immunotherapy.

T Kumai, Y Matsuda, K Oikawa, N Aoki, S Kimura, Y Harabuchi, E Celis, H Kobayashi

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. EGFR: New Insights on Its Activation and Mutation in Tumor and Tumor Immunotherapy.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

T Kumai1] Department of Pathology, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Japan [2] Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Japan.
Y Matsuda
K Oikawa
N Aoki
S Kimura
Y Harabuchi
E Celis
H Kobayashi
Asahikawa Medical University · JPMoffitt Cancer Center · US

Funding

Treatment of Melanoma with Optimzed Peptide VaccinesR01CA136828 · NCI · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR & RES INST · PI CELIS, ESTEBAN · 2009 to 2013
$1.7M
Interferon-gamma limits the effectiveness of peptide vaccines for cancerR01CA157303 · NCI · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR & RES INST · PI CELIS, ESTEBAN · 2012 to 2017
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA136828NCI NIH HHS R01CA136828NCI NIH HHS R01 CA157303NCI NIH HHS R01CA157303
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHead and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is a major cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality worldwide. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-targeted therapy is an attractive strategy alternative to conventional cancer treatments for HNSCC, but its efficacy remains controversial. T-cell-based immunotherapy has been proposed as a novel therapeutic approach to improve the clinical outcome for HNSCC. In this study, we report human epidermal receptor (HER) family epitopes that induced CD4 T-cell responses to HNSCC. The results provide support for a novel strategy to treat HNSCC by combining EGFR-targeted therapy with T-cell-based immunotherapy.

methodsWe evaluated the capacity of predicted CD4 T-cell peptide epitopes from EGFR to induce antitumour immune responses in vitro. In addition, EGFR inhibitors were evaluated for their ability to augment tumour MHC class II expression in HNSCC cell lines and subsequently increase T-cell recognition.

resultsAmong several predicted peptide epitopes, EGFR875-889 elicited CD4 T-cell responses that were restricted by HLA-DR4, DR15, or DR53 molecules, indicating that the peptide functions as a promiscuous T-cell epitope. The peptide-reactive T cells responded to autologous dendritic cells loaded with EGFR-expressing tumour cell lysates, indicating that these epitopes are naturally processed. In addition, the CD4 T cells were capable of directly recognising and killing HNSCC cells expressing EGFR and the appropriate HLA class II molecule. T cells reactive with the EGFR875-889 epitope could be detected in the blood of HNSCC patients. EGFR875-889-reactive CD4 T cells were also able to recognise several peptide analogues derived from homologous regions of EGFR family members, HER-2, HER-3 and c-MET. Finally, we examined the effects of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibition or EGFR-blocking antibodies on CD4 T-cell tumour reactivity. Treatment of tumour cells with the EGFR inhibitors enhanced tumour recognition by EGFR875-889-reactive T cells presumably due to the upregulation of HLA-DR expression in the HNSCC cells.

conclusionWe identified novel CD4 T-cell EGFR epitopes and amongst these, EGFR875-889 functions as a promiscuous helper T-cell epitope that can elicit effective antitumour T-cell responses against tumours expressing HER family members and c-MET. These observations should facilitate the translation of T-cell-based immunotherapy into the clinic for the treatment of HNSCC and provide a rational basis for EGFR inhibition, immune-targeted combination therapy.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAnimalsCarcinoma, Squamous CellCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCell Line, TumorCross ReactionsEpitopes, T-LymphocyteErbB ReceptorsHead and Neck NeoplasmsHLA-DR AntigensHumansJurkat CellsMaleMCF-7 CellsMiceMolecular Sequence DataEGFR protein, humanEpitopes, T-LymphocyteErbB ReceptorsHLA-DR AntigensPeptide Fragments

Identifiers

PMID24045666
PMCPMC3798972
OpenAlexW1968854753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.