ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. B2013
Experiments optimized for magic angle spinning and oriented sample solid-state NMR of proteins.
Article in The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Structural biology of supramolecular assemblies by magic-angle spinning NMR spectroscopy.Quarterly reviews of biophysics · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Structure determination by solid-state NMR of proteins is rapidly advancing as a result of recent developments of samples, experimental methods, and calculations. There are a number of different solid-state NMR approaches that utilize stationary samples, aligned samples, or magic angle spinning of unoriented "powder" samples, and depending on the sample and the experimental method they can emphasize the measurement of distances or angles, ideally both, as sources of structural constraints. Multidimensional correlation spectroscopy of low-gamma nuclei such as (15)N and (13)C is an important step for making resonance assignments and measurements of angular restraints in membrane proteins. However, the efficiency of coherence transfer predominantly depends upon the strength of the dipole-dipole interaction, and this can vary from site to site and between sample alignments, for example, during the mixing of (13)C and (15)N magnetization in stationary aligned and in magic angle spinning samples. Here, we demonstrate that the efficiency of polarization transfer can be improved by using adiabatic demagnetization and remagnetization techniques on stationary aligned samples, and proton assisted insensitive nuclei cross-polarization in magic angle sample spinning samples. The adiabatic cross-polarization technique provides an alternative mechanism for spin-diffusion experiments correlating (15)N/(15)N and (15)N/(13)C chemical shifts over large distances. Improved efficiency in cross-polarization with 40-100% sensitivity enhancements is observed in proteins and single crystals, respectively. We describe solid-state NMR experimental techniques that are optimal for membrane proteins in liquid crystalline phospholipid bilayers under physiological conditions. The techniques are illustrated with data from single crystals both of peptides and of membrane proteins in phospholipid bilayers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.