ArticleBMC family practice2013
Morbidity and doctor characteristics only partly explain the substantial healthcare expenditures of frequent attenders: a record linkage study between patient data and reimbursements data.
Article in BMC family practice, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Frequent attenders in late life in primary care: a systematic review of European studies.BMC family practice · 2017Pooled it
- Frequent attenders in primary health care in Finland: use of primary care services and patient characteristics.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2026Article
- Lessons learned from a trial on integrated and proactive care for patients with complex needs (Hotspotters project): a process evaluation.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Consultation frequency and general practitioners' and practices' characteristics.BMC primary care · 2023Article
- Article
- Article
- Risk factors for the frequent attendance of older patients at community health service centers in China: a cross-sectional study based on stratified sampling.BMC family practice · 2021Article
- Sociodemographic characteristics and disability pensions of frequent attenders in occupational health primary care - a follow-up study in Finland.BMC public health · 2021Article
- Article
- Continuity of care as a predictor of ongoing frequent attendance in primary care: a retrospective cohort study.BJGP open · 2020Article
- Frequent attenders in the German healthcare system: determinants of high utilization of primary care services. Results from the cross-sectional German health interview and examination survey for adults (DEGS).BMC family practice · 2020Article
- Identifying subgroups of high-need, high-cost, chronically ill patients in primary care: A latent class analysis.PloS one · 2020Article
- Article
- Associations between healthcare consumption in country of origin and in country of residence by people with Turkish and Moroccan backgrounds living in the Netherlands: the HELIUS study.European journal of public health · 2019Article
- Health-related quality of life among frequent attenders in Swedish primary care: a cross-sectional observational study.BMJ open · 2019Observational
- Characteristics of Elderly Frequent Attendees in Slovene Family Medicine Practices - a Cross-sectional Study.Materia socio-medica · 2019Article
- Determinants of Frequent Attendance of Outpatient Physicians: A Longitudinal Analysis Using the German Socio-Economic Panel (GSOEP).International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019Article
- Comparing occasional and persistent frequent attenders in occupational health primary care - a longitudinal study.BMC public health · 2018Article
- Article
- Clinical characteristics of persistent frequent attenders in primary care: case-control study.Family practice · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFrequently attending patients to primary care (FA) are likely to cost more in primary care than their non-frequently attending counterparts. But how much is spent on specialist care of FAs? We describe the healthcare expenditures of frequently attending patients during 1, 2 or 3 years and test the hypothesis that additional costs can be explained by FAs' combined morbidity and primary care physicians' characteristics.
methodsRecord linkage study. Pseudonymised clinical data from the medical records of 16 531 patients from 39 general practices were linked to healthcare insurer's reimbursements data. Main outcome measures were all reimbursed primary and specialist healthcare costs between 2007 and 2009. Multilevel linear regression analysis was used to quantify the effects of the different durations of frequent attendance on three-year total healthcare expenditures in primary and specialist care, while adjusting for age, sex, morbidities and for primary care physicians characteristics. Primary care physicians' characteristics were collected through administrative data and a questionnaire.
resultsUnadjusted mean 3-year expenditures were 5044 and 15 824 Euros for non-FAs and three-year-FAs, respectively. After adjustment for all other included confounders, costs both in primary and specialist care remained substantially higher and increased with longer duration of frequent attendance. As compared to non-FAs, adjusted mean expenditures were 1723 and 5293 Euros higher for one-year and three-year FAs, respectively.
conclusionsFAs of primary care give rise to substantial costs not only in primary, but also in specialist care that cannot be explained by their multimorbidity. Primary care physicians' working styles appear not to explain these excess costs. The mechanisms behind this excess expenditure remain to be elucidated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.