ReviewOncoTargets and therapy2013
Targeting cancer stem cells: emerging role of Nanog transcription factor.
Review in OncoTargets and therapy, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 99 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
99 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 167 citations in OpenAlex.
- Meta-analysis identifies key genes and pathways implicated in Benzo[a]pyrene exposure response.Chemosphere · 2024Pooled it
- The role of pluripotency regulators in triple-negative breast cancer immune response.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Review
- Oncogenic B-Raf proto-oncogene, serine/threonine kinase-mediated hedgehog signalling in the pathogenesis and targeted therapy of melanoma.World journal of clinical oncology · 2025Review
- Sensitisation of HeLa Cell Cultures to Xanthone Treatment by RNAi-Mediated Silencing of NANOG and STAT3.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Article
- Molecular Diplomacy of Lipids in the War of Immunity: Bridging Rare and Common Disease Mechanisms.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- The dual role of autophagy in cancer stem cells: implications for tumor progression and therapy resistance.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Review
- Prognostic Value of SOX2 and NANOG Expression in Recurrent Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Cancers · 2025Article
- Circulating tumor cell markers for early detection and drug resistance assessment through liquid biopsy.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Targeting cancer stem cells by TPA leads to inhibition of refractory sarcoma and extended overall survival.Molecular therapy. Oncology · 2024Article
- Review
- From Crypts to Cancer: A Holistic Perspective on Colorectal Carcinogenesis and Therapeutic Strategies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- ExploitingInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Stereospecific NANOG PEST Stabilization by Pin1.Biochemistry · 2024Article
- Hepatocellular carcinoma patients serum modulates the regenerative capacities of adipose mesenchymal stromal cells.Heliyon · 2024Article
- The prognostic and immune significance of PLBD1 in pan-cancer and its roles in proliferation and invasion of glioma.Journal of Cancer · 2024Article
- Zebrafish drug screening identifies Erlotinib as an inhibitor of Wnt/β-catenin signaling and self-renewal in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia.Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie · 2024Article
- The transposable element-derived transcript of LIN28B has a placental origin and is not specific to tumours.Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG · 2023Article
- Clinicopathologic Impact of NANOG, ZEB1, and EpCAM Biomarkers on Prognosis of Serous Ovarian Carcinoma.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2023Article
- The role of transposable elements in aging and cancer.Biogerontology · 2023Review
- The Glioblastoma Landscape: Hallmarks of Disease, Therapeutic Resistance, and Treatment Opportunities.Medical research archives · 2023Article
39 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The involvement of stemness factors in cancer initiation and progression has drawn much attention recently, especially after the finding that introducing four stemness factors in somatic cells is able to reprogram the cells back to an embryonic stem cell-like state. Following accumulating data revealing abnormal elevated expression levels of key stemness factors, like Nanog, Oct4, and Sox2, in several types of cancer stem cells; the importance and therapeutic potential of targeting these stemness regulators in cancers has turned to research focus. Nanog determines cell fate in both embryonic and cancer stem cells; activating Nanog at an inappropriate time would result in cancer stem cells rather than normal pluripotent stem cells or differentiated somatic cells. Upregulated Nanog is correlated with poor survival outcome of patients with various types of cancer. The discoveries of downstream regulatory pathways directly or indirectly mediated by Nanog indicate that Nanog regulates several aspects of cancer development such as tumor cell proliferation, self-renewal, motility, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, immune evasion, and drug-resistance, which are all defined features for cancer stem cells. The current review paper illustrates the central role of Nanog in the regulatory networks of cancer malignant development and stemness acquirement, as well as in the communication between cancer cells and the surrounding stroma. Though a more defined model is needed to test the therapeutic efficacy of targeting Nanog as a cancer treatment method, current animal experiments using siNanog or shNanog have shown the promising therapeutic potential of Nanog targeting in several types of cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.