Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24043823›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2013

Localizing transcripts to single cells suggests an important role of uncultured deltaproteobacteria in the termite gut hydrogen economy.

Adam Z Rosenthal, Xinning Zhang, Kaitlyn S Lucey, Elizabeth A Ottesen, Vikas Trivedi, Harry M T Choi, Niles A Pierce, Jared R Leadbetter

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Mapping a multiplexed zoo of mRNA expression.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2016
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Acetogenesis from H2 plus CO2 and nitrogen fixation by an endosymbiotic spirochete of a termite-gut cellulolytic protist.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  9. New Technologies for Studying Biofilms.Microbiology spectrum · 2015
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Adam Z RosenthalRonald and Maxine Linde Center for Global Environmental Science, Department of Bioengineering, and Department of Computing and Mathematical Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125.
Xinning Zhang
Kaitlyn S Lucey
Elizabeth A Ottesen
Vikas Trivedi
Harry M T Choi
Niles A Pierce
Jared R Leadbetter
Linde (United States) · USBioengineering Center · RU

Funding

Hybridization Chain Reaction: In Situ Amplification for Biological ImagingR01EB006192 · NIBIB · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI PIERCE, NILES A · 2005 to 2022
$5.2M
NIBIB NIH HHS 5R01 EB006192NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB006192
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identifying microbes responsible for particular environmental functions is challenging, given that most environments contain an uncultivated microbial diversity. Here we combined approaches to identify bacteria expressing genes relevant to catabolite flow and to locate these genes within their environment, in this case the gut of a "lower," wood-feeding termite. First, environmental transcriptomics revealed that 2 of the 23 formate dehydrogenase (FDH) genes known in the system accounted for slightly more than one-half of environmental transcripts. FDH is an essential enzyme of H2 metabolism that is ultimately important for the assimilation of lignocellulose-derived energy by the insect. Second, single-cell PCR analysis revealed that two different bacterial types expressed these two transcripts. The most commonly transcribed FDH in situ is encoded by a previously unappreciated deltaproteobacterium, whereas the other FDH is spirochetal. Third, PCR analysis of fractionated gut contents demonstrated that these bacteria reside in different spatial niches; the spirochete is free-swimming, whereas the deltaproteobacterium associates with particulates. Fourth, the deltaproteobacteria expressing FDH were localized to protozoa via hybridization chain reaction-FISH, an approach for multiplexed, spatial mapping of mRNA and rRNA targets. These results underscore the importance of making direct vs. inference-based gene-species associations, and have implications in higher termites, the most successful termite lineage, in which protozoa have been lost from the gut community. Contrary to expectations, in higher termites, FDH genes related to those from the protozoan symbiont dominate, whereas most others were absent, suggesting that a successful gene variant can persist and flourish after a gut perturbation alters a major environmental niche.

Indexed as

AnimalsBase SequenceComputational BiologyDeltaproteobacteriaDNA, ComplementaryDNA PrimersFormate DehydrogenasesGastrointestinal TractHydrogenIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceIsopteraMetagenomeMicrofluidicsMolecular Sequence DataPhylogenyReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionDNA, ComplementaryDNA PrimersFormate DehydrogenasesHydrogenRNA, Ribosomal, 16Sacetogenesismicrofluidic digital PCRRNA-Seq

Identifiers

PMID24043823
PMCPMC3791709
OpenAlexW2095727721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.