Interval examination: building primary care teams in an urban academic teaching clinic.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Senior Residents' Perspectives and Intentions to Teach in Outpatient Primary Care Settings.Journal of general internal medicine · 2025
   Article
2. Striving toward team-based continuity: provision of same-day access and continuity in academic primary care clinics.BMC health services research · 2019
   Article
3. How best to structure interdisciplinary primary care teams: the study protocol for a systematic review with narrative framework synthesis.Systematic reviews · 2016
   Article
4. Clinic First: 6 Actions to Transform Ambulatory Residency Training.Journal of graduate medical education · 2016
   Article
5. Internal Medicine Residents' Perceptions of Team-Based Care and its Educational Value in the Continuity Clinic: A Qualitative Study.Journal of general internal medicine · 2015
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as