SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2013
Package of care for active management in labour for reducing caesarean section rates in low-risk women.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Caesarean section in uninsured women in the USA: systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ open · 2019Pooled it
- Non-clinical interventions for reducing unnecessary caesarean section.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Frequency and determinants of misuse of augmentation of labor in France: A population-based study.PloS one · 2021Trial
- Reducing neonatal morbidity by discontinuing oxytocin during the active phase of first stage of labor: a multicenter randomized controlled trial STOPOXY.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2020Trial
- A cluster-randomized field trial to reduce cesarean section rates with a multifaceted intervention in Shanghai, China.BMC medicine · 2020Trial
- Timing of cesarean section for prolonged labor in urban Tanzania: A criterion-based audit.AJOG global reports · 2024Article
- Evidence-Based Strategies to Minimize Unnecessary Primary Cesarean Sections: A Comprehensive Review.Cureus · 2024Review
- The evolution of the labor curve and its implications for clinical practice: the relationship between cervical dilation, station, and time during labor.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2023Review
- Does giving birth in a "birth environment room" versus a standard birth room lower augmentation of labor? - Results from a randomized controlled trial.European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X · 2021Article
- Shared decision-making in maternity care: Acknowledging and overcoming epistemic defeaters.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2019Article
- Study protocol for a randomised trial evaluating the effect of a "birth environment room" versus a standard labour room on birth outcomes and the birth experience.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2019Article
- Implementation of evidence-based practices in normal delivery care.Revista latino-americana de enfermagem · 2018Article
- Relaxation of the one child policy and trends in caesarean section rates and birth outcomes in China between 2012 and 2016: observational study of nearly seven million health facility births.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2018Observational
- A method to assess obstetric outcomes using the 10-Group Classification System: a quantitative descriptive study.BMJ open · 2017Article
- Article
- An Analysis of Caesarean Sections in a Community Cottage Hospital in Nigeria's Niger Delta Using The Robson Classification.Nigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical AssociationArticle
- An overview of systematic reviews of normal labor and delivery management.Iranian journal of nursing and midwifery researchReview
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundApproximately 15% of women have caesarean sections (CS) and while the rate varies, the number is increasing in many countries. This is of concern because higher CS rates do not confer additional health gain but may adversely affect maternal health and have implications for future pregnancies. Active management of labour has been proposed as a means of reducing CS rates. This refers to a package of care including strict diagnosis of labour, routine amniotomy, oxytocin for slow progress and one-to-one support in labour.
objectivesTo determine whether active management of labour reduces CS rates in low-risk women and improves satisfaction. SEARCH
methodsWe searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (16 April 2013). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials comparing low-risk women receiving a predefined package of care (active management) with women receiving routine (variable) care. Trials where slow progress had been diagnosed before entry into the trial were excluded. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: At least two review authors extracted data. We assessed included studies for risk of bias. MAIN
resultsWe included seven trials, with a total of 5390 women. The quality of studies was mixed. The CS rate was slightly lower in the active management group compared with the group that received routine care, but this difference did not reach statistical significance (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.01). However, in one study there was a large number of post-randomisation exclusions. On excluding this study, CS rates in the active management group were statistically significantly lower than in the routine care group (RR 0.77 95% CI 0.63 to 0.94). More women in the active management group had labours lasting less than 12 hours, but there was wide variation in length of labour within and between trials. There were no differences between groups in use of analgesia, rates of assisted vaginal deliveries or maternal or neonatal complications. Only one trial examined maternal satisfaction; the majority of women (over 75%) in both groups were very satisfied with care. AUTHORS'
conclusionsActive management is associated with small reductions in the CS rate, but it is highly prescriptive and interventional. It is possible that some components of the active management package are more effective than others. Further work is required to determine the acceptability of active management to women in labour.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.