Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24043399›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology2014

Complications of ERCP.

Nalini M Guda, Duvvuru Nageshwar Reddy, Ajay Kumar

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Endoscopic management of cystic stump leaks: Insights from a tertiary care center.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. ERCP and complications of small bowel perforation.Gastroenterology and hepatology from bed to bench · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in children: Retrospective series with a long-term follow-up and literature review.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2019
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Cholecystectomy for idiopathic acute pancreatitis: Not yet there!Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nalini M GudaSt. Luke's Medical Center and University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Milwaukee, USA.
Duvvuru Nageshwar Reddy
Ajay Kumar

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is performed commonly for therapy. Its role in pancreaticobiliary diagnostic imaging has significantly decreased over time. Despite advances in our knowledge of the risk factors, complications, (especially post-ERCP pancreatitis), remain a significant problem. This review highlights the risk factors as related to the patient, procedure and the endoscopist, and the possible means to prevent complications. The best way to avoid any complication is "to avoid any procedure where the indication is not strong" and especially to refrain from doing diagnostic ERCP when alternate noninvasive imaging such as magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography is available.

Indexed as

Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradeCholangitisCholecystitisContraindicationsHemorrhageHumansIntestinal PerforationPancreatitisRisk Factors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.