ArticleAnnals of internal medicine2013
Perceptions, knowledge, and satisfaction with contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among young women with breast cancer: a cross-sectional survey.
Article in Annals of internal medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01468246 (Helping Ourselves, Helping Others), which is not on this map. Cited by 115 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Helping Ourselves, Helping Others: The Young Women's Breast Cancer Study
Who cites it
115 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Feasibility and Efficacy of Decision Aids to Improve Decision-Making for Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy: A Systematic Review.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Emotion regulation and choice of bilateral mastectomy for the treatment of unilateral breast cancer.Cancer medicine · 2023Trial
- Patient perspectives on testing for clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential.Blood advances · 2022Trial
- B-Sure: a randomized pilot trial of an interactive web-based decision support aid versus usual care in average-risk breast cancer patients considering contralateral prophylactic mastectomy.Translational behavioral medicine · 2020Trial
- Association Between Decision Regret and Psychosocial Outcomes Following Surgery Among Women with Unilateral Nonhereditary Breast Cancer.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Factors influencing decision regret regarding contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in women at high risk of hereditary breast cancer: a cross-sectional study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- Contributing factors of contralateral breast cancer in patients with BRCA mutation (ON-BRCA II study, KoREa-BSG 11).Breast cancer research : BCR · 2026Article
- Breast cancer surgery in the era of genetic uncertainty: real-world outcomes in BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants and variants of uncertain significance.BMC cancer · 2026Article
- Impact of bilateral surgery on time to treatment in patients with breast cancer undergoing mastectomy - a retrospective cohort study.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Understanding Patient Decision-Making in Breast Cancer Surgery: Risk Perception, Communication, and Psychosocial Influences.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Impact of the American Society of Breast Surgeons' Guidelines on Genetic Testing and Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy Rates.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- The Incidence of Occult Malignancy in Contralateral Risk Reducing Mastectomy Among Affected Breast Cancer Gene Mutation Carriers in South Korea.Journal of breast cancer · 2025Article
- Emotional Reactivity and Regulation Relate to Surgical Treatment Decision Making Among Newly Diagnosed Women With Breast Cancer.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
- What Do Patients With Cancer Know, or Want to Know, About Genomic Tumor Sequencing and Genetic Testing? A State-of-the-Art Review.Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology · 2024Review
- "Peace of Mind" After Mastectomy: A Scoping Review.Annals of surgical oncology · 2024Article
- ASO Author Reflections: "Peace of Mind" After Surgery for Breast Cancer: Implications for Preference-Sensitive Shared Decision Making.Annals of surgical oncology · 2024Article
- Article
- Society of Surgical Oncology Breast Disease Site Working Group Statement on Contralateral Mastectomy: Indications, Outcomes, and Risks.Annals of surgical oncology · 2024Review
- Evaluation of quality of life and socio-emotional impact of oncological treatment among patients with breast cancer.Journal of medicine and life · 2024Article
- Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for unilateral breast cancer in Chinese female population: a retrospective cohort study.Gland surgery · 2023Article
55 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- SummaryForPatientsIn
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
unlabelledChinese translation
backgroundRates of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) have increased dramatically, particularly among younger women with breast cancer, but little is known about how women approach the decision to have CPM.
objectiveTo examine preferences, knowledge, decision making, and experiences of young women with breast cancer who choose CPM.
designCross-sectional survey.
setting8 academic and community medical centers that enrolled 550 women diagnosed with breast cancer at age 40 years or younger between November 2006 and November 2010. PATIENTS: 123 women without known bilateral breast cancer who reported having bilateral mastectomy. MEASUREMENTS: A 1-time, 23-item survey that included items related to decision making, knowledge, risk perception, and breast cancer worry.
resultsMost women indicated that desires to decrease their risk for contralateral breast cancer (98%) and improve survival (94%) were extremely or very important factors in their decision to have CPM. However, only 18% indicated that women with breast cancer who undergo CPM live longer than those who do not. BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers more accurately perceived their risk for contralateral breast cancer, whereas women without a known mutation substantially overestimated this risk. LIMITATIONS: The survey, which was administered a median of 2 years after surgery, was not validated, and some questions might have been misinterpreted by respondents or subject to recall bias. Generalizability of the findings might be limited.
conclusionDespite knowing that CPM does not clearly improve survival, women who have the procedure do so, in part, to extend their lives. Many women overestimate their actual risk for cancer in the unaffected breast. Interventions aimed at improving risk communication in an effort to promote evidence-based decision making are warranted. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Susan G. Komen for the Cure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.