Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24042365›Full record

ArticleAnnals of internal medicine2013

Perceptions, knowledge, and satisfaction with contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among young women with breast cancer: a cross-sectional survey.

Shoshana M Rosenberg, Michaela S Tracy, Meghan E Meyer, Karen Sepucha, Shari Gelber, Judi Hirshfield-Bartek, Susan Troyan, Monica Morrow, Lidia Schapira, Steven E Come and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of internal medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01468246 (Helping Ourselves, Helping Others), which is not on this map. Cited by 115 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
115citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01468246 active not recruitingnot on this map

Helping Ourselves, Helping Others: The Young Women's Breast Cancer Study

TypeobservationalSponsorDana-Farber Cancer InstituteRan2006 to 2035Enrolled1,302ConditionsBreast Cancer
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

115 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Factors influencing decision regret regarding contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in women at high risk of hereditary breast cancer: a cross-sectional study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. "Peace of Mind" After Mastectomy: A Scoping Review.Annals of surgical oncology · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

55 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Shoshana M Rosenberg
Michaela S Tracy
Meghan E Meyer
Karen Sepucha
Shari Gelber
Judi Hirshfield-Bartek
Susan Troyan
Monica Morrow
Lidia Schapira
Steven E Come
Eric P Winer
Ann H Partridge

Funding

Harvard Education Program in Cancer Prevention Control (R25T)R25CA057711 · NCI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (SCH OF PUBLIC HLTH) · PI DAVISON, KIRSTEN · 1992 to 2018
$8.5M
NCI NIH HHS 5 R25 CA057711NCI NIH HHS R25 CA057711
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledChinese translation

backgroundRates of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) have increased dramatically, particularly among younger women with breast cancer, but little is known about how women approach the decision to have CPM.

objectiveTo examine preferences, knowledge, decision making, and experiences of young women with breast cancer who choose CPM.

designCross-sectional survey.

setting8 academic and community medical centers that enrolled 550 women diagnosed with breast cancer at age 40 years or younger between November 2006 and November 2010. PATIENTS: 123 women without known bilateral breast cancer who reported having bilateral mastectomy. MEASUREMENTS: A 1-time, 23-item survey that included items related to decision making, knowledge, risk perception, and breast cancer worry.

resultsMost women indicated that desires to decrease their risk for contralateral breast cancer (98%) and improve survival (94%) were extremely or very important factors in their decision to have CPM. However, only 18% indicated that women with breast cancer who undergo CPM live longer than those who do not. BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers more accurately perceived their risk for contralateral breast cancer, whereas women without a known mutation substantially overestimated this risk. LIMITATIONS: The survey, which was administered a median of 2 years after surgery, was not validated, and some questions might have been misinterpreted by respondents or subject to recall bias. Generalizability of the findings might be limited.

conclusionDespite knowing that CPM does not clearly improve survival, women who have the procedure do so, in part, to extend their lives. Many women overestimate their actual risk for cancer in the unaffected breast. Interventions aimed at improving risk communication in an effort to promote evidence-based decision making are warranted. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Susan G. Komen for the Cure.

Indexed as

Decision MakingHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePatient SatisfactionPerceptionAdultBreast NeoplasmsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGenes, BRCA1Genes, BRCA2HumansMastectomyMutationProspective StudiesRisk FactorsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID24042365
PMCPMC3968260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.