Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24042074›Full record

ReviewAtencion primaria2013

[Current evidence on the motivational interview in the approach to health care problems in primary care].

Julia Bóveda Fontán, Luis Ángel Pérula de Torres, Manuel Campiñez Navarro, Josep M Bosch Fontcuberta, Nieves Barragán Brun, Jose Antonio Prados Castillejo, en representación del Grupo Colaborativo Estudio Dislip-EM

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
In one paragraph

Review in Atencion primaria, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Julia Bóveda FontánEquipo de Atención Primaria Colmeiro, Vigo, España. Electronic address: jboveda1@gmail.com.
Luis Ángel Pérula de Torres
Manuel Campiñez Navarro
Josep M Bosch Fontcuberta
Nieves Barragán Brun
Jose Antonio Prados Castillejo
en representación del Grupo Colaborativo Estudio Dislip-EM

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The motivational interview has been widely used as a clinical method to promote behavioural changes in patients, helping them to resolve their ambivalence to obtain their own motivations. In the present article, a review is made of the main meta-analyses and systematic and narrative reviews on the efficacy of the motivational interview in the primary health care environment.

Indexed as

Behavior TherapyMotivational InterviewingBody WeightChronic DiseaseDietExerciseHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicPrimary Health CareReview Literature as TopicSmokingAtención primaria de saludCambio de hábitosChange in habitsEntrevista motivacionalMotivational interviewPrimary health care

Identifiers

PMID24042074
PMCPMC6985504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.