ReviewParasitology international2014
In vivo imaging in NHP models of malaria: challenges, progress and outlooks.
Review in Parasitology international, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mini-review and situation report on the role and usefulness of nuclear medicine imaging for malaria.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Review
- Single-cell analyses of polyclonal Plasmodium vivax infections and their consequences on parasite transmission.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Role of riboflavin deficiency in malaria pathophysiology.PLoS pathogens · 2024Review
- Single-cell analyses of polyclonalResearch square · 2024Article
- A mouse ear skin model to study the dynamics of innate immune responses against the microsporidianFrontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Vesicular stomatitis virus-based vaccine targeting plasmodium blood-stage antigens elicits immune response and protects against malaria with protein booster strategy.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- HIV-1 Impact on Malaria Transmission: A Complex and Relevant Global Health Concern.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021Review
- Assessment of the subtypes and the zoonotic risk of Blastocystis sp. of experimental macaques in Yunnan province, southwestern China.Parasitology research · 2020Article
- Vaccination With Sporozoites: Models and Correlates of Protection.Frontiers in immunology · 2019Review
- Humanized Mouse Models for the Study of Human Malaria Parasite Biology, Pathogenesis, and Immunity.Frontiers in immunology · 2018Review
- An expanding toolkit for preclinical pre-erythrocytic malaria vaccine development: bridging traditional mouse malaria models and human trials.Future microbiology · 2016Review
- Malaria modeling: In vitro stem cells vs in vivo models.World journal of stem cells · 2016Review
- Ensuring transmission through dynamic host environments: host-pathogen interactions in Plasmodium sexual development.Current opinion in microbiology · 2015Review
- No more monkeying around: primate malaria model systems are key to understanding Plasmodium vivax liver-stage biology, hypnozoites, and relapses.Frontiers in microbiology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Animal models of malaria, mainly mice, have made a large contribution to our knowledge of host-pathogen interactions and immune responses, and to drug and vaccine design. Non-human primate (NHP) models for malaria are admittedly under-used, although they are probably closer models than mice for human malaria; in particular, NHP models allow the use of human pathogens (Plasmodium falciparum, Plasmodium vivax, Plasmodium malariae and Plasmodium knowlesi). NHPs, whether natural hosts or experimentally challenged with a simian Plasmodium, can also serve as robust pre-clinical models. Some simian parasites are closely related to a human counterpart, with which they may share a common ancestor, and display similar major features with the human infection and pathology. NHP models allow longitudinal studies, from the early events following sporozoite inoculation to the later events, including analysis of organs and tissues, particularly liver, spleen, brain and bone marrow. NHP models have one other significant advantage over mouse models: NHPs are our closest relatives and thus their biology is very similar to ours. Recently developed in vivo imaging tools have provided insight into malaria parasite infection and disease in mouse models. One advantage of these tools is that they limit the need for invasive procedures, such as tissue biopsies. Many such technologies are now available for NHP studies and provide new opportunities for elucidating host/parasite interactions. The aim of this review is to bring the malaria community up to date on what is currently possible and what soon will be, in terms of in vivo imaging in NHP models of malaria, to consider the pros and the cons of the various techniques, and to identify challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.