Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24041978›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the National Cancer Institute2013

Sex hormone levels and risk of breast cancer with estrogen plus progestin.

Ghada N Farhat, Neeta Parimi, Rowan T Chlebowski, Joann E Manson, Garnet Anderson, Alison J Huang, Eric Vittinghoff, Jennifer S Lee, Andrea Z Lacroix, Jane A Cauley and 6 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Royal jelly and its hormonal effects in breast cancer: a literature review.Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Linking Physical Activity to Breast Cancer via Sex Steroid Hormones, Part 2: The Effect of Sex Steroid Hormones on Breast Cancer Risk.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Try113His and His139Arg polymorphisms in the microsomal epoxide hydrolase gene are not associated with risk of breast cancer.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2014
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Ghada N FarhatAffiliations of authors: San Francisco Coordinating Center, California Pacific Medical Center Research Institute, San Francisco, CA (GNF, NP, SRC); Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Balamand, Beirut, Lebanon (GNF); Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA (RTC); Division of Preventive Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (JEM); Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA (GA, AZL); Department of Internal Medicine, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA (AH, DG); Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA (EV); Department of Internal Medicine, University of California-Davis, Sacramento, CA (JSL); Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA (JAC); Department of Internal Medicine, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH (RJ); Department of Preventive Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY (DL); Department of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA (LP); Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI (MSS).
Neeta Parimi
Rowan T Chlebowski
Joann E Manson
Garnet Anderson
Alison J Huang
Eric Vittinghoff
Jennifer S Lee
Andrea Z Lacroix
Jane A Cauley
Rebecca Jackson
Deborah Grady
Dorothy S Lane
Lawrence Phillips
Michael S Simon
Steven R Cummings
Harbor–UCLA Medical Center · USCalifornia Pacific Medical Center · USFred Hutch Cancer Center · USThe Lundquist Institute · USUniversity of California, Davis · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USThe Ohio State University · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

UCLA Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR000124 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI DUBINETT, STEVEN M. · 2012 to 2015
$57.0M
A Multidimensional Approach to Urogenital Aging in Older WomenK23AG038335 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI HUANG, ALISON · 2011 to 2013
$504k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000124NIA NIH HHS K23 AG038335
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough high endogenous sex hormone levels and estrogen plus progestin (E+P) therapy are associated with increased breast cancer risk, it is unknown whether pretreatment levels of sex hormones modify E+P effect on breast cancer.

methodsWe conducted a nested case-control study within the Women's Health Initiative randomized clinical trial of E+P. The trial enrolled 16608 postmenopausal women aged 50 to 79 years with intact uterus and no breast cancer history. During a mean of 5.6 years of follow-up, 348 incident breast cancer case subjects were identified and matched with 348 control subjects. Case and control subjects had their sex hormone levels measured at baseline (estrogens, testosterone, progesterone, and sex hormone-binding globulin [SHBG]) and year 1 (estrogens and SHBG) using sensitive assays. All statistical tests were two-sided.

resultsStatistically significant elevations in breast cancer risk were seen with greater pretreatment levels of total estradiol (P trend = .04), bioavailable estradiol (P trend = .03), estrone (P trend = .007), and estrone sulfate (P trend = .007). E+P increased all measured estrogens and SHGB at year 1 (all P < .001). The effect of E+P on breast cancer risk was strongest in women whose pretreatment levels of total estradiol, bioavailable estradiol, and estrone were in the lowest quartiles. For example, the odds ratio for E+P relative to placebo was 2.47 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.28 to 4.79) in the lowest total estradiol quartile, compared with 0.96 (95% CI = 0.44 to 2.09) in the highest total estradiol quartile; P interaction = .04).

conclusionsWomen with lower pr-treatment endogenous estrogen levels were at greater risk of breast cancer during E+P therapy compared with those with higher levels. Further studies are warranted to confirm these findings.

Indexed as

AgedBreast NeoplasmsCase-Control StudiesEstradiolEstrogen Replacement TherapyEstrogensEstroneFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGonadal Steroid HormonesHumansIncidenceMiddle AgedOdds RatioPostmenopauseProgesteroneEstradiolEstrogensEstroneestrone sulfateGonadal Steroid HormonesProgesteroneProgestinsSex Hormone-Binding GlobulinTestosterone

Identifiers

PMID24041978
PMCPMC3787910
OpenAlexW2150738525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.