Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24041231›Full record

Trial reportJournal of consulting and clinical psychology2013

An adaptive approach for identifying cocaine dependent patients who benefit from extended continuing care.

James R McKay, Deborah H A Van Horn, Kevin G Lynch, Megan Ivey, Mark S Cary, Michelle L Drapkin, Donna M Coviello, Jennifer G Plebani

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 32 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00685659 nacompletednot on this map

Effectiveness of Extended Treatments for Drug Dependence

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PennsylvaniaRan2007 to 2011Enrolled332ConditionsCocaine DependenceArmsIntensive Outpatient Treatment, Adaptive telephone-based counseling, Adaptive telephone-based counseling plus incentives
NCT04650386 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Enhancing Office-based Buprenorphine Treatment: An Adaptive Psychosocial Approach

TypeinterventionalSponsorPublic Health Management CorporationRan2020 to 2024Enrolled125ConditionsOpioid-use DisorderArmsPsychosocial support determined by adaptive treatment algorithm
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Psychosocial interventions for stimulant use disorder.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Guideline
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. The role of the working alliance in treatment for alcohol problems.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2015
    Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

James R McKayDepartment of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania.
Deborah H A Van Horn
Kevin G Lynch
Megan Ivey
Mark S Cary
Michelle L Drapkin
Donna M Coviello
Jennifer G Plebani

Funding

Effectiveness of Extended Treatments for Drug DependenceR01DA020623 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MCKAY, JAMES R. · 2006 to 2010
$3.6M
Adaptive Treatment Models for the Management of Drug Use DisordersK24DA029062 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MCKAY, JAMES R. · 2010 to 2021
$1.6M
AFTERCARE FOR SUBSTANCE ABUSERSK02DA000361 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MCKAY, JAMES R. · 1998 to 2008
$900k
NIDA NIH HHS K02 DA000361NIDA NIH HHS K24 DA029062NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA020623
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveStudy tested whether cocaine dependent patients using cocaine or alcohol at intake or in the first few weeks of intensive outpatient treatment would benefit more from extended continuing care than patients abstinent during this period. The effect of incentives for continuing care attendance was also examined.

methodParticipants (N = 321) were randomized to treatment as usual (TAU), TAU and telephone monitoring and counseling (TMC), or TAU and TMC plus incentives (TMC+). The primary outcomes were (a) abstinence from all drugs and heavy alcohol use and (b) cocaine urine toxicology. Follow-ups were at 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months.

resultsCocaine and alcohol use at intake or early in treatment predicted worse outcomes on both measures (ps ≤ .0002). Significant effects favoring TMC over TAU on the abstinence composite were obtained in participants who used cocaine (odds ratio [OR] = 1.95 [1.02, 3.73]) or alcohol (OR = 2.47 [1.28, 4.78]) at intake or early in treatment. A significant effect favoring TMC+ over TAU on cocaine urine toxicology was obtained in those using cocaine during that period (OR = 0.55 [0.31, 0.95]). Conversely, there were no treatment effects in participants abstinent at baseline and no overall treatment main effects. Incentives almost doubled the number of continuing care sessions received but did not further improve outcomes.

conclusionAn adaptive approach for cocaine dependence in which extended continuing care is provided only to patients who are using cocaine or alcohol at intake or early in treatment improves outcomes in this group while reducing burden and costs in lower risk patients.

Indexed as

Continuity of Patient CareLong-Term CareAdultAlcoholismCocaine-Related DisordersComorbidityCost-Benefit AnalysisCost of IllnessCounselingFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhiladelphiaSubstance Abuse Detection

Identifiers

PMID24041231
PMCPMC3938091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.