Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24041225›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2013

Breast cancer receptor status and stage at diagnosis in over 1,200 consecutive public hospital patients in Soweto, South Africa: a case series.

Valerie A McCormack, Maureen Joffe, Eunice van den Berg, Nadine Broeze, Isabel dos Santos Silva, Isabelle Romieu, Judith S Jacobson, Alfred I Neugut, Joachim Schüz, Herbert Cubasch

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 110 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Valerie A McCormack
Maureen Joffe
Eunice van den Berg
Nadine Broeze
Isabel dos Santos Silva
Isabelle Romieu
Judith S Jacobson
Alfred I Neugut
Joachim Schüz
Herbert Cubasch
Centre International de Recherche sur le Cancer · FRChris Hani Baragwanath Hospital · ZAColumbia University · USNational Health Laboratory Service · ZAUniversity of London · GB

Funding

Columbia-South Africa Training Program for Research on HIV-associated MalignanciD43CA153715 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI NEUGUT, ALFRED I. · 2010 to 2013
$1.8M
NCI NIH HHS 1D43CA153715NCI NIH HHS D43 CA153715
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEstimates of the proportion of estrogen receptor negative (ERN) and triple-negative (TRN) breast cancer from sub-Saharan Africa are variable and include high values. Large studies of receptor status conducted on non-archival tissue are lacking from this region.

methodsWe identified 1218 consecutive women (91% black) diagnosed with invasive breast cancer from 2006–2012 at a public hospital in Soweto, South Africa. Immunohistochemistry based ER, progesterone receptor (PR) and human epidermal factor 2 (HER2) receptors were assessed at diagnosis on pre-treatment biopsy specimens. Mutually adjusted associations of receptor status with stage, age, and race were examined using risk ratios (RRs). ER status was compared with age-stratified US Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results program (SEER) data.

results35% (95% confidence interval (CI): 32-38) of tumors were ERN, 47% (45-52) PRN, 26% (23-29) HER2P and 21% (18-23) TRN. Later stage tumors were more likely to be ERN and PRN (RRs 1.9 (1.1-2.9) and 2.0 (1.3-3.1) for stage III vs. I) but were not strongly associated with HER2 status. Age was not strongly associated with ER or PR status, but older women were less likely to have HER2P tumors (RR, 0.95 (0.92-0.99) per 5 years). During the study, stage III + IV tumors decreased from 66% to 46%. In black women the percentage of ERN (37% (34-40)) and PRN tumors (48% (45-52)) was higher than in non-black patients (22% (14-31) and 34% (25-44), respectively, P = 0.004 and P = 0.02), which remained after age and stage adjustment. Age-specific ERN proportions in black South African women were similar to those of US black women, especially for women diagnosed over age 50.

conclusionAlthough a greater proportion of black than non-black South African women had ER-negative or TRN breast cancer, in all racial groups in this study breast cancer was predominantly ER-positive and was being diagnosed at earlier stages over time. These observations provide initial indications that late-stage aggressive breast cancers may not be an inherent feature of the breast cancer burden across Africa.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsBreast NeoplasmsBreast Neoplasms, MaleErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm StagingPopulation GroupsReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, Progesterone

Identifiers

PMID24041225
PMCPMC3978918
OpenAlexW2150216545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.