ArticleJournal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS2013
Environmental monitoring for Aspergillus fumigatus in association with an immunosuppressed rabbit model of pulmonary aspergillosis.
Article in Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- NIH4215: A mutation-prone thiamine auxotrophic clinicalFrontiers in fungal biology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aspergillus fumigatus causes life-threatening pneumonia in immunocompromised patients. Conidia, the infectious form of the organism, are handled in a biologic safety cabinet under BSL2 conditions. However because germinated conidia form noninfectious hyphae in tissue, we hypothesized that rabbits inoculated intratracheally would grow A. fumigatus in their lungs but that the environment would remain free of this fungus, potentially permitting maintenance of infected animals under ABSL1 conditions. We performed a surveillance study for the presence of A. fumigatus in the environment before proceeding with antifungal therapy studies of experimental pulmonary aspergillosis. The expected outcome included absence of A. fumigatus in the environment, stool, and blood and presence in rabbit lungs. Female SPF New Zealand white rabbits were immunosuppressed and inoculated intratracheally (n = 4) or intraesophageally (n = 2) with 1.25 × 10(8) conidia of A. fumigatus. Feces, pan liners, and walls were sampled daily during the 11-d experiment, and blood was sampled on days 2, 6, and 8 after inoculation. Samples were cultured on 5% Sabouraud glucose agar plates. Lungs were weighed and scored for hemorrhagic infarcts and homogenized for culture on 5% Sabouraud glucose agar and trypticase soy agar plates. Blood cultures, rabbit stool, and environmental swabs were all negative for A. fumigatus whereas the lungs inoculated intratracheally demonstrated 4.5 × 10(2) ± 0.8 × 10(2) CFU/g of A. fumigatus. Therefore, neutropenic rabbits with experimental invasive pulmonary aspergillosis do not shed conidia of A. fumigatus and can be safely housed under ABSL1 conditions after inoculation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24041208PMC3784658W15214498What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.