Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24040487›Full record

ArticleACS medicinal chemistry letters2013

Pharmacological activity of retinoic acid receptor alpha-selective antagonists

Sanny S W Chung, Rebecca A D Cuellar, Xiangyuan Wang, Peter R Reczek, Gunda I Georg, Debra J Wolgemuth

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS medicinal chemistry letters, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Non-hormonal Contraception: Current and Emerging Targets.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Emerging approaches to male contraception.Fertility and sterility · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Development of Novel Male Contraceptives.Clinical and translational science · 2020
    Review
  15. The future of male contraception: a fertile ground.Translational andrology and urology · 2018
    Review
  16. Beyond the Condom: Frontiers in Male Contraception.Seminars in reproductive medicine · 2016
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Male contraception.Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology · 2014
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sanny S W ChungDepartment of Genetics and Development, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY 10032.
Rebecca A D Cuellar
Xiangyuan Wang
Peter R Reczek
Gunda I Georg
Debra J Wolgemuth
Columbia University · USUniversity of Minnesota · USColumbia University Irving Medical Center · US

Funding

Drug Discovery & Synthesis of Contraceptive AgentsU01HD076542 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI GEORG, GUNDA I. · 2012 to 2016
$5.0M
Retinoid Receptor Antagonists as Novel Male ContraceptivesU01HD060479 · NICHD · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI WOLGEMUTH, DEBRA J. · 2009 to 2018
$2.7M
NICHD NIH HHS N01 HD053400NICHD NIH HHS U01 HD060479NICHD NIH HHS U01 HD076542
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oral administration of a retinoic acid receptor (RAR) pan-antagonist reversibly inhibits spermatogenesis. Given the importance of RARα in regulating spermatogenesis, we identified two RARα-selective antagonists by transactivation and transactivation competition assays and asked whether they effectively inhibit spermatogenesis. Although these two antagonists were potent

Indexed as

antagonistdrug property profilingRetinoic acid receptor alphaspermatogenesis

Identifiers

PMID24040487
PMCPMC3770188
OpenAlexW2022820817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.