ArticlePloS one2013
Penetration of fosfomycin into IPEC-J2 cells in the presence or absence of deoxynivalenol.
Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Formulation, development and characterization of fosfomycin tromethamine pessaries for the treatment of vaginal infections.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Interactions of naturally occurring compounds with antimicrobials.Journal of pharmaceutical analysis · 2023Review
- Article
- Fosfomycin: Uses and potentialities in veterinary medicine.Open veterinary journal · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fosfomycin (FOS) is an antibiotic used in pig farms for treatment and prevention of infections caused by resistant bacteria during the post-weaning period. Antibiotics and non-toxic concentrations of mycotoxins, such as deoxynivalenol (DON) are frequently found in the diet of animals. These compounds can establish interactions in the intestinal tract, which could affect and/or modify the penetration of FOS to enterocytes. The aim of this study was to determine the penetration of FOS into IPECJ-2 cells, a cell line derived from the small intestine of piglets, in the presence and absence of DON. The results from this study showed that there was statistically significant difference in the intracellular concentration of FOS between cells incubated with 580 µg/ml FOS and cells incubated with 580 µg/ml FOS and 1 µg/ml DON. The Cmax of the intracellular antibiotic in the culture plates incubated with FOS in absence of DON was 45.81 µg/ml with a tmax of 4 h. When IPEC-2 cells were incubated with FOS and DON the Cmax was 20.06 µg/ml and the tmax was 30 min. It is concluded that the non-toxic concentration of DON on IPEC-J2 cells after short-term exposure, interferes with the pharmacokinetics of the antibiotic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.