Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24040317›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Dietary restriction extends lifespan in wild-derived populations of Drosophila melanogaster.

Athanasios Metaxakis, Linda Partridge

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  5. Response of fruit fly (Physiological entomology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Obesity May Accelerate the Aging Process.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2019
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Athanasios MetaxakisMax Planck Institute for Biology of Ageing, Cologne, Germany ; Institute of Healthy Ageing and Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Linda Partridge
Max Planck Institute for Biology of Ageing · DEUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 098565
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dietary restriction (DR) can result in lifespan-extension and improved function and health during ageing. Although the impact of DR on lifespan and health has been established in a variety of organisms, most DR experiments are carried out on laboratory strains that have often undergone adaptation to laboratory conditions. The effect of DR on animals recently derived from wild populations is rarely assessed. We measured the DR response of four populations of Drosophila melanogaster within two generations of collection from the wild. All populations responded to DR with an increase in lifespan and a decrease in female fecundity, similarly to a control, laboratory-adapted strain. These effects of DR are thus not a result of adaptation to laboratory conditions, and reflect the characteristics of natural populations.

Indexed as

Caloric RestrictionDietAdaptation, PhysiologicalAgingAnimalsDrosophila melanogasterFemaleFertilityLongevity

Identifiers

PMID24040317
PMCPMC3769260
OpenAlexW2038980608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.